Article clipped from London Journal

Dr. STOUGHTON’s Great CordialElixir,'is prepared from the Original Receipt,.by me Elizabeth, the Wilt;iw of Arara- Stoughton, who' was Co pan- | net with Mt. Richard Stoughton till this 4th of April 171** and the Stock being then divided between us, Tain now ' removed to my watehoufc in Thieadoecdle-fttect* nextthe Gar ter Co ee-houfe, againft the Royal Exchange) . where allMerchants, Captains, Shop-keepers, c.=maybe fuppi cd with* the uftul Allowances forrherr E conrage-mect.{ Pray obferve theijreio?, there being aPetfon thatis'a'Widi.w under the Ptazza^s * f-the Royal Exchange, who 1bmc People may miftake, thinking it,to be my Wane* houfc,* •*The Widow of Aram StoughtonV Reply toIMr. Richard Stoughton's Anfwyr. v If Silence was no;. Ibmerimes reckon'd a Pre-fnmption cf Guilt, and the not anfvming a Charge a fortof an'Acknowledgment cf the Tiuth of ir, after what fhave already publifhed, it wou’d be unnecefiapgr to take any Notice ora Jate tcandalous AdvettifemenrUlrich mf j Brother Richard Sioaghroh hath been 10 kind to publHh 5j* againft me* caHiagit an Anfwertqonehe had befdic forced J me to write, becaufe it Is wsll known to all ourAequatn-j tance how litiie 1 aeferve thofe Calumnies and Repro tchc*I he has thought fit to load me with * and whichi inftead ‘I of doing*mc any Prejudice among them, hath retained I with the great eft Difciddiz and Dilarfvancage apoahim-*-| feif, and more effeftually confirmed the Worlds in- the 1 I Opinion they always had cf him, than any thing! wou’d r willingly have laid againft him. And 1 perfwadc myfejt£.-.I thofe to whom I have not the Favour to be known? and,1 who {hall happen to caft an Eye upon hisAdvcrtiferoenr^ t and confidcr the manner in which it is wrote, the mean.I and fcun ileus Language ufed therein, and the Rancour I and Malice that runs thro* the whole, will , from thence?I . even without say other Evidence of my,Innocence, be lo I candid as to determine in my Favour v Plainly. pcicciviDg'I all the Inveives and Rilierici againftjme to .have no'I other Foundation than the Malice an* Eovy|of, the ill-5 I natured Aurhoi, who not hcuSg”able toanfwerMatterxiof • Fn, hat rtcourfe ro Scandal ;an4.Dctradion 5 a Method j only uled by the meaneft fort of Men* and who have I nothing elfe to offer in their own Vindication.I It is plain my Brother is ufing bis utmoft Endeavours I for mv Ruin j and that roofor.rnis very Rtafon, becaofe I I am h s late Brother’s Widow, and have,two fmaliCbil-I dten, whom I am endeavouring to maintain, by follow-! ing a Bufinefsl have an equal Right ro, and am as capable I of managing as ray good Brother i for he cannot .deny I but the Original Receipt for mafciug the Elbe t is now in I rh: Hands of %obm ‘Bernard, Efqj' Executor to icy I ther Stoughton, from whom both'my Brother dad I had*I Copies 5 and if that bcn't fufficiem, I have a Pcifon toj afljft me, who faorwitbftandixsg my Brothers Affcrtions to the contrary) during the-whole Time of the Parrnei-I fliip between us, even to ihe Expiration of the Patent,I was conftanriy employed in preparing the mgrcdieats and*I making the Elixir, ana is as pcrtely acquainted with the I Mnhod tnereof a- it is poCSble for any one to be.My Brother, a' the Clofe of his Advertisement, i*.pleaied to take leave of me5 I therefore muft return theComplinienr, and it is by recommending to his feriousI Confederation his cxi€t Methid of Bookkeeping from I Ofto^er 1724 to the Expiration of the Patent, to fee, If j upon perufal of his Accounts durrag that Time, he cao’c difcovcr a fmall Milc-imputarion ot two in ftii own favour perhaps in the whole to the Value of s’ooj.oi fome fuch Sura 5 which, if io, I appeal to.the World if heought not to makp lorae Swisfaion for the fame to me.
Newspaper Details

London Journal

London, Middlesex, GB

Tue, Jul 02, 1726

Page 4

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Samantha B.

WI, USA 27 May 2020

Other Publications Near London, Middlesex

Bingleys Journal

Arminian Magazine

London Daily Mail

London Stars and Stripes

London Daily Universal Register