aX i \v that iht1 K e *21 e v libel suit is in■; [\ Itin* Howard Circuit Court it is not in- ! appropriate to keep tab on tin* matters ami things therein contained from 1 lt;ui irlt;•lt;a Kokomo viewpoint. Regarding aVlate turn in the ease tin* Kokomo Dis- :frpatch says: William 11. Kelley lias, tit seems. not let loose all hold on theI \damage suit business after all. It was ! *j I Vreported that William had dismissed I his suits against the Logansport \ Phams and Times for £10.00(J dam- * (M a ires each, and that there Would be no !further ]roseeution of the (rases. This ; tl is true of the ease against the Pharos, j tl but not so with the Times. The j n plaintiff asked for a change of venue j p in the-case airainst the Times, claim- j lt;r imr that lie could not get an even I slt;i ^44handed justice hi the (hiss Circuit Court. The defendant then filed a j c;motion that the suit be venued to this j iicountv. which was granted. The j o• ’ ipapers were filed with Clerk Ellis yes- i terdav.slt;, F Keirlev-accuses Charles lt;). Fenton. ; *■ ieditor and proprietor of the Times.11 awith publishing false and damaging ! ^ statements against him. It is charged that llie article* complained of staledthat Ketrlev h.ad boasted of ha'ing» * «jnarri(*d a widow worth anywhere from one to two millions. The Times writer also called him a 'billy goat.and this is something Mr. Ketrbvwouldamu stand.t lt;1 i0 a1 1