thcirdemlu this.case Judge Dewly chai-ged the jury to the effect ibat if Griswold iemployed Joseph \V. 1 rew and J. W. ]!ouf a Its his agents to go to the de-1 paitments to get in fori nation about , t|e the gonoinonei* of the war claims des- m c.ribed in this action that Griswold I fe was presumed to know whatever Drew ! j);j or House knew about them, and that j (jhe was chargeable therewith whether I ]0thev did or did not communicate it to*Griswold. At the time of theargu-jj, uient of the dt ft iidtuit's motion for a j new trial last December the Judge re- I ei quested the attorneys on both sides to j 01 furnish him with authorities on this point, and on January 11th the motion I J’was ov. rruted. Judge Deady, in the jdecision rendered, slated that even if di this was an error the Court should not I dgrant a new trial because the error is !' slight, and if a new trial wan granted y the verdict would be bound to be the I ti rame unleHh Jte jury did great injus-I utice to the law and evidence. The verdict is for £33,225, anti ibe costs of the suit, amounting to $2,389 more.hifeCi«!ri