yeper Ww. H- MOCKED KEYDEARS AS Orissey OF Mrenrasce. omens. the Terki«ch Daerer, Having Been sued by om Actress, Took Two changes of Venue, and the Court Says She Was Sot destined. Jutes Witem H. Moore, of the expo yer cour. sanded down 88 oral optics to the case of Kate Percell va. Qmere et el. which is of consigersbie tm- Toe point Involved wae wheta @ a Bot aftr taking a change of venue qm one funtion, eed change tould be taken by merely Gitog with se second portice #8 atderit to the effect that the Qitendant could not have fair apd im til Jedge Moore held that a gwood change of venus could only be se vered by SLDE as a Midayiteeting forth pa of the facie seoWleg prejudices of otuet oes 6 month ago Kate Petree, on patreni, brought suit against Omens, tua dancer, and the other proprietors of the Orpieum Avemter, for Caceres in @erum of BG She alleged in her com print that the deten@sats vegagenuy and a@icmly permotted her rune and ward pole to D4 styles from the “green room”’ of the tester The salt Was originally Growusht before Justice McCoriecy, of Co lumta precinct. Omese, through her al torney, appeared’ and fied an afidavit that gee could not have @ fair ard impartial tral before Justice McCurley, and the cars was wrapeferred to Justice Gifford, of Ful ton precinct. Here Omene again fied an e@davit, acking for a second change of venue to Justice Austin’s court. Judge @if ford refused to grant the change and as did not appear won the case came to trial, Judge Giffard accordingly entered judgment for the pialott by default. Omene secured a writ of review from Judge Moore of the superior court to le gue to Justice Gifford. The ant wae @ade reternable last Tuesday. Then the pasntit Gilet a motion to quash the writ, @hieh was granted yesterday. dude Moore held that on an affidavit the defendant was entitled to mn change @1 venue only from the original justice, and that in order to have a further change $0 affidavit should be fied. eetting up the facts showing a prejudice or other rea fore why a fair and impertial trial coggia not be entured. The court stated that an F vit such as necessary to secure a of venue in the superior court would be necensary. When a judge of the superior court conq quered this point several years ago he handed down an opinion that the defend est could have ao many changes, without moving merits or cause, a9ce desired. This opinion was taken advantage of to Sterneys Wishing to evade trying cases on their merits and the plaintiffs put to it expense. Nearly every attorney In city is Interested In the point, which she finaly decided to the present cane, Omene is not yet satisfied and will, it said, appesl to the supreme court. a teen Lees oft Sie Fortsomests “pagers of ASmints bl Edward Bowden ; hes tied yester- Fis en dase tanne SN Hewley re the ag Mit ©ay. Judge Benson denied it on the receiver and erected “@ cOGr to the gerstwiring coeditors ms deciles ingaring property was re- Judge FD. Henson yedertay egned an GErecting Georgett Raterts guard ian of the estate of Trier © ineahe person (o eeil the unfincaned mull of his ecitaner toe $06 ian W Peters, this Sart Was ewer’! 2 fee of poo Teatertuy goed en orter ext 3 vate enle of the ger a in 7 of the entate of Ernest E. fectodie if one thare of the i Stuck of the = tor eae ba for he purposer of pay ing up the remaining dens of the estate elaiee sapien of A. SM. Birkel for Gis Hat ‘7 = die t 5 a une one yes rites by Judas Benen. I made an asignment for the beneft of Bit creditere severe! years ago to Chris » Wieeheartly after, it reclaimed aft 773 whkoOOwR, was Rirket and the restore in the jared he pelities was Somaunews cut pre) * Corporation Coun! Poeve yeeterda the papers in the action the city wi te = condemn the land ‘hat wilt. be te . is esta laliie oo ea why Hvet averice alle a4 ine octhward to Bae’ Mas *om, Street. ‘The atets of land that will be tied te for a highway seventy feet wide. provided for by BP ordinance recently passed by the city eoanch. The ery ew were concerned Oe Ai and the caes will not Conteat od.