to keep T[To the Editor of the 'Vliig.Sia,— Shortly after the publication ol nn speech of December 1st, I learned that Mr, Chancellor I lender non had, prior to D.. Laudct ’* appointment, admitted that the Hilltop was aware of th« di-dike of tho people ol Kingston to Dr. Lauder. Yesterday, being desiroui of settling the matter, ft * *f util) beyond doubt but bejoiid question, 1 called on Mr. La Serre and stated wliat I had heard, whereupon that gentleman frankly acknowledged that, shortly before Dr. Lauder's induction, Mr. Henderson had called upon him and had stated in the i nurse ot conversation, that Dr. Lauder could not In* appointed, because the Bishop, at the time ol the Rev. Alex.. Stewart s linal duuui»«al, hat remark*d to him (Mr. Henderson), “ The people of Kingston seem to be %er\ much afraid of my bringing Dr Lauder here. They nerd not he til.aid ; 1 have n» such iptention !” If this be correct, and [ presume. Mr. Henderson will riot denv that it is, if not verbatim, at aany rate substantially so, I trust we shall hear no more ol Hi* Lordship* ignorance of the terlings ol the congregation of St. George’s relative to in Lauder.Your obedient servant.It. J. Cabtwbu.iit.Kingston, Jan. 15, 1 Ht|;lI he conversation be I ween Mr Hin-oersnn and Mr La Serre, was a matter of notoriety some week* ago.-[Ed. B. Whig.