before u oul of his e cnb-rance-lendcr ) New npanywere u the ild re-liocker misted i from of the n toty not with a n. Of ik. but hat be ffer of r right treas-»velt a undent t prop-n frombis claim at the bearing and tneir decision la In favor of Thom peon.The* case of James L Cardwell Involves land situated In township 48 north, range 4 went. According to the decision It appears that Card-well msde his entry on December 22, 1889. and hta final proof for the land on Dec. 22. 1904. On January 28. 1905. his proof was rejected by the local office because of insufficient evidenceOt» February 17. 1905. Cardwell made application to bare him proof accepted as commutation proof, but It was rejected by the local office. He look an appeal from the derls-lou to the coiumlaaloner, who sustained them, finding the entry of Cardwell to be In bad faith. He followed with an appeal to the secretary, who sustained the decision of the commissioner.On July 2. 1907, he made application for a rehearing and It was granted him. On November 14. he made bis appearance and submitted proof on his behalf and the local officers hold that the evidence submitted shows the entry lo have been made In good faith.