The Gentleman who assumed to answer my article of truth ter the feme-sole ih question, acknowledged his inefficiency by a gross diagression of the essential Issue, 'and utterly faiTed to establish even a single element of the corpus delicti. Instead of demonstrating his adequacy by treating the cake walk, he proved Ms inability to meet the requisite issue, by exploding his wrath under a nom de plume, upon your unworthy servant.Fortunately for me another cake ; walk” came to my rescue, which*deigned to ftnbfeu my spirit with concurrent vigor, and forfeit a grand contribution of power in my defense, viz..