N Hawthomthwalti Rictlvei Ricognltkm At Th. Hindi 01 The Matter Of Eceaonlc Kaewledge Aid Tactic*.In th*-in*eared 11Western Clarion of Nov. 18, communication from•oniracie Humphrey, of Seattle, ad-° 1 ,0 Comrade Hawthornth-Nanaimo, in which theaite,Lrlllt,r made some criticism of centrestoiciii.n'ts made by the latter ling a recent speech. Along with W11S published Hawthorn-ite’s reply thereto. Presuma|)ly, j(|j0,- of the comrades considered difference of opinion arising be-“U them to he of sufficient con-Mfuence «o attract the attention ( ,he scientific world, or to call irth cither praise or condemnation om those intellectual giants whose wisdom and keen Judgment mus^ depended upon to steer the poor norant proletariat safely through p whirlpools of tho approachingre-* lution. Mnt. at least one of these nirades was not to escape chas-ement at the hands of lynx-eyed siloni for having dared to express opinion without having first been nji-hI of its soundness by he who owoth nil things. Hawthorn-A-ftite has been honored by what s evidently intended as a vigor-3 swift kirk h.v the worthy person o condescended to do the honor-It is, of course, more of hon-to he cv. n kicked by the great in not to Im* noticed by them attie honor of being noticed by the fountain head of wisdom, es-ally of the economic brand, has i Us? owed upon Haiwthorn-aito somewhat thusly’ u*n* is published in the City of York, n sheet called The Peo-It U rumored that it is pub-il as a daily and a weekly. Some Id and irreverential ones dijbj the •r tin- Weakly Peep/* which isl*n r li»r il * in* I Ika man, single-handed, and alone, may, under certain circumstances be a wage.earner and a wage-payer, a profit taker and a profit payer, and at the same time lie neither a capitalist nor a wage-eamer.1 his remarkable discovery made a most profound impression upon the world of economic research, making plain many things that had hitherto been obscured, as any one can readily see.Hut enough of this wonderful man. Now to the honor he ha*s condescended to bestow upon Hawthornthwalte Of course, inasmuch as his editorial emditeness—sounds better than editorial majesty—knew that the leaders of the “People” and the readers of the Western Clarion would not be the same persons to any great extent, it would have been the part of decency to have reproduced Haw-thornthwaito’s article and followed it with such criticism as deemed ne-vessary. It is presumably, however, the privilege of genius to hide itself behind the folds of any dirty rag that may come handy. This inclination arises purely from modesty no doubt.Ifawthornthwftite gets over two columns of honor in the “Weakly Peep” of Dec. 9th. dust what the editorial person intended to be driving at during this two columns of drivel is not very clear. It is no reproduced here for two reasons One is that, inasmuch as the “Peo pie” did not reproduce Hawthorn thwaite’s article, thus giving it: readers an opportunity to judge i upon its merits, the two columns o drivel referred to cannot be taken a.' argument worthy of rebuttal. An other reason is that we have no de sire to criticize the aforesaid drivel A reproduction of certain passage: will lie ((title sufficient.