Hide Article Text (OCR)
the judgment could not be opened, full opportunity for hearing being had before Squire E. P. Hildebrand and no defence was set up there and no action taken until judgment was obtained in court.Guerseers of the poor of Cherryhill township vs. Sarah Fettennan and Daniel Fetterman, This was an action by the overseers to compel Mrs. Fetterman, the wife of Michael Fetterman a pauper, and Daniel Fetterman, son of the pauper, to maintain and support the said pauper. The overseers endeavored to show that Mrs. Fetterinun owned a farm, in good condition, in Cherryhill township, and D. W. Fettennan also had a small place in the same township, and that they could very well support the pauper. Mrs. Fetterman claimed that when she was supporting her husband, their son, D. W, Fetterman, persuaded him to leave. D. W. Fetterman set up as a defense that he is entitled to receive the $1.50 per week contracted by the overseers for the pauper’s keeping, the pauper now being at his home, that the land did not belong to him, and that all the personal property about the place belonged to the woman who was keeping house for him. Testimony all heard and case to be argued this morning.( 'nsninmillLiiii C'luli PIhci Inndate yers afte unit! kirn beiu Foil Viet Stuc S. c Ci brai urcr Job: son, SlatYiworTillSatifustworcomclusourrenting.tO Siing
Newspaper Details
Indiana County Gazette
Indiana, Pennsylvania, US
Wed, Dec 09, 1891
Page 5
Full Page
Clipped by
Annie C.
IL, USA 24 Mar 2025
Other Publications Near Indiana, Pennsylvania
Indiana Democrat
Indiana Weekly Progress
Indiana Progress
Indiana Messenger
Indiana Evening Gazette
