At the Cuty Small Dette Court on Friday, before Me. KA. Manking, PLM, and Mesera, Quiny and apy, ID, veridiviy for plaintiffs were given in the following un- Qefended cones: Andrew Hogle, hostel in the estate of J. 9. Manwaring, in liquidation, ¥. EB. W. Way, goods sell, work and labour and material supplied, S11 12m, il, and Ga, Od, covte; same 7, G. Sheppard, goode wold, work and labour and rmaterial supplied, ales mousy paid, £ 5 12a. f., and Se. Gd. coatn ; Hall and Gibbs v. A. De Castres, gonds paid and subscription, £ 7 1Bu., and G9, Od, coats time ¥. J. Wood, gooda sold, subscription, wodl money pair, £ 5 de, Gd., and Oa, td. vonte; Queensland Woolth Manufacturing Com pany, Limited » FLOF. Woy, balance of told ani interset, LG tw., wd Ay, Gd, ete. T. ©. Botrao and Co. ¥. Geo smith, goods cdd and mon pea ‘Tor tay, 2 de. Td. and Ge fd. enptry ye Ly Haltulay 9. oF. Connor, jun, balance of goode wold, £ 2 Om, bi, and’ In. conte: A. Kruger v. J. Foley, balance of goods sold and interest charged, £ 2 60. 6d. and Ba anste. To the defended case, William James Overell v. William Ham, damages £ 415, judgment was given for plaintiff for the amount claimed, with waste of court 6., and mix witness on £ 1 10s. In the defended case, Jung Barrett v, James Brannen, rent, £ 3 on.udgmant was given for plaintiff for £ 2 60, sod Jn. 6d. posts, to be held of the rata al 7a. Od. Week, Frat papmant on Decem ber 14, in defended rasa, 7 Hunter v A. Fi. M‘Cready, goods sold and delivered, Hidfield, was adjourned till December 14, as request of defendant; defendant to pay Professional costs, £ 5 2a, and witnness ca’ expenses, 15a,