Mr Vnlder on Mn 2t» inline that In i)ur«tlin hnd n risen a.- to 'he poel- !Hon lt;»t imy coloured woman who n»ii-ht have married nn Australian. in so fur nn rcminh-d h*-r rlmm to ad-ml’i-ion Inin that nurt'ry on nccom-pnnying her h'mhnnd There wis a* ln-« one iiiHiuinc in which tha repatriated husband hud bren unahle to take hi . roloured wife anil children with him In hh reply '« thin lt;'oiiimiiriir.it ion M Vnldor wrote • hut., re |iin nf mlour ware not permitted to Innd In Australia. he h.ul l»«fu ii| 1„ rrpiil.rintr any 'tl»-t ration who unit Known to ho tnar-rt.il to a n«l«»\t-'it woman Tlo knew thal In anma cases Australians nnrtother white ntlt; »t who wen* nmrriftd tlt;lt;coloured women hut gone ft* X**^* Irnlin. I.m ihi- w|i«‘c lU1,l families rtl thf-e men could not he nllownl to land there :rv (m-itlnn of those coloured wiv. nnd th-lr children la a very haul on. hut It remains with themHoU. .xml ti„ authorities in -South Africa to Initiate proceedings with 'hlt;- (ih)rcl of bringing these husbands hark to that Country It. would Ik well, however, lo institute Impii rl.-s on thh. -tide t.. uncertain these Australians mnrrlod to colour#! Women obtained passAge- ut the pulv lic expense and whether Uitf are contributing to th- support of the wires and fnmilieB they left behind