Ir5sci*eLsrr**Experts Admit 'PhenomenaNOf 'Eying SaucerIfflmttrnie* tttm F»gfrJtL_.In the Philippines from 1931 to 1934, taugh$ astronomy and navi-gatfon at Harvard from 1942 to 1941 and has writtfeh extensively In the ftdd of astronomy:The expert opinion, as far as I can gather It. is that no one knows what they are.No scientist can begin to speculate on what a 'flying saucer’ is because none ever has broken down.In brief, it Is a subject in whichthere can be no speculation be* ^1 dauae It is too indefinite.1 Louis Henry Crook, head of thete etAmerica, wJ)AJbllL^«Rfict»d.JffV eral Important Invention*.in-the field of aerodynamic*; • •A* far back at iWt'mex; have been experimenting in ‘tasking machine* which look life*' flying saucers. A number of such machine* have beeii perfected.'There l* nothin# in aerodyn|mJ^ which denies that such machine* can be made to travel at very high Speed. *But thli subject of 'flying' saucers’ which is t being talked abouttoday, especially on the theory that they may come from another I planet, a person should alt downiIIfIt1!i^ AJj 1school of aeronautical engineering at the Catholic University ofsomethin# like thisAny man-made device is never perfect Many are supposed tohave seen these so-called 'flying saucers' but there never has been any report that one ha* broken down. Therefore, we must reasonably conclude that they are not} man-made.And even if they were made by inhabitants of another planet, they would not be perfect and eventually would have to break down. But none has ever broken down, tI pmanally believe they are natural phenomena and I look tothe identlsti in meteorology and kindred field* to come tipsome-day with the. answer to the pur-ale.bavtaaos'Prt