Tl'eSdjlt, Kirn Apbli, I875r I1k»fut\* I[, fckroU* K*q., P.M’p and Jm, HatincU,JiNtp, J.P.LmiWKJi.VJ.’HU,Three flrimkwli wenu brought teforv thelt;V)Urt and siimrajinty dealt with.ILLZUALLV CQKSFIIIIJtO TO I]BOICT LJlWFI'iLtoMiliNL*.Jo] i ii Schin et?, John Burry, Frtalcruik Smith, William Allen, Judea MoIyneiiK* and Charley Uruwn, churned oil warrant with combining to-gi-iher in disobey lawful cuiumajid^ on board the AiiLfrirrtTi ship Aifher, ora the 15th initant, weft iordered on tnwirtl the whip., the captuin *tati.ngthat hewnidd nithilrar the charge on the prisoners proniHLncto return to their duly.LABOR NY.James II-'.'lmy, charged *vith stealing a pair of viamie-Hide buots, the property of Mr. 8. Watson, ol' NtTTfjMitlp, on the l^th imtant, pleaded iml guilty, and wan remanded I ill Wednesday, hr the ovidenwr of a witness named Chares Hupih, who stated that he Haw the pri-NImer Uh1 t. In-1 bwits freuo the simp of proiwutoriThe nidi riis‘ id* the prisoner was .searched. and a pnir of bnnt-? found »n the premium.WillinM I hilliiJHhcrul appeared on ho non on s Up ail:sWei n charge nf u* mud ting and beating one l.*ut he Hue -May* of the age of 14 years, on the1 Ifli iiisitiinr,Mr. J- I y Meaglief appeared for the complaia-qiiIp and Mr, Keadett for the defenet*.'I’llc L'vidL'ii™ lor the complainant tan to the rfU'iH lIuiL she Inn! been living at defendent'ii house for about nix teen or seventeen month*.Un Thursday last alio was sent by Mr*. Hollin-ahemr* servant to see what o'clock it was, and oil her ivliini the defendant beat her with a whip, hurting her hack very much. Two wit-Ui'RSeri appeared for the eoiuplui^ant, one of whom sww murk* on he* hack, wliieh was aore for three day*.In emsa-examination., complainant acknowledged thill ili'fenditiil had cautioned her before about going oui 4 and she denied petting out ofthe window at eleven o'clock at nights “he wiel uunaj-jfirl at Mr*. Hullinahrad'i ; * lie had been in the I in bit of going to Ti mmony' h to sec the time of day ; there wain a clock at Mn. Hollin-^head's, hut it had stypjHvl ; Mr* KoUinaheadhad n, watch on her.The evidence for the defence was that defendant had frequently cautioned the girl agminct going out at night and in the daytime, but that hJic had peniitcd in doing bo in deftaoce of hi* order*. Ho had only idmdmtered what he considered Yell’dewrpeu punishment.These facta wet* clearly proved by thu evidence s and the bunch, in, diHioiBaing the ease, exjifTHcd an opinion that the defendant w*a perfectly justified, and had only done hii duty in f li*Hlinmg I be girl for going out at night when ordered not to do no.