TETTENHALL AND ATCHERLEY CXN'AL. Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY presented two petitions from two indirida*ls against the Tettenhall and AtcherJcy Cana! Bill, and complaining that the stand* ing orders had not been complied with.Mr. O. GORE said that the petitions iovolved a public case against a private monopoly, and that by the formation of the canal there vroutd be a saving; to the public of 2,000i. He regretted that the hon* baronet shoald bring such a shameful case before the house.