fellow citizens.I am, very respectfully yours,CAPT. K. H. STILES.trieu ananew penrL-itIIitIIerevstIn reply to his boot and shoe story, I would refer him to (\ C. Thompson, who knows that all the transactions 1 had were legitimate and proper. I didprotlt;Pt‘t my own claim by putting it inthe hands of my attorneys to look after. But the statement is false that goods were either ordered or received without the intention of paying for them in full.And the large stock he speaks of, was received and settled for in full within ten days after they were received. For proof I would refer you to Jack Richardson, Elmira, N. Y., the party from whom they were purchased.I have now got down to where he either lied in his statement in the Ledger of Oct.or Nov. 4th. On Oct. 28th lietiteat gritmess cirecreated, was notaway thefor tiftv \In theBoard recommittc juriously been law the penit of the hiPhiladel]his pardiwith on* Oheads his article in large type, thus: “Statement of \V. W. Kemble, Chiu.Kemble and James Kinnear, under oath.” He then cites you to the case asis7.f*ewas gran and vet were asfri-No. 43, Dec. Tr., 1880, and pretends togive you W. W. Kemble’s sworn state-LSL-*tl-ei-Vefiliroinent, also l)i\ Kemble’s and James Kin-neaf’s. He gave you the wrong number so you could not find it. i he correct number is 45. But after the above gentlemen informed me that they were falselv represented, and said for me to refer anv one to the records for their testimony, I examined the records and found he had garbled them, and so stated in my letter to the Mail Nov. 1st.; for proof of which examine court records.Now to get out of his dilemma, he says: “It was a statement voluntarilygiven by W. W. Kemble for publication Oct. 19tli.” Now I cannot believe Mr. Kemble ever knowingly signed the statement they publish, as coming voluntarily from him, unless he was bulldozed, as it is tlm reverse pf hi#. SWprn statement as taken before Charles Dins-moor, Master, as the records show. Now when they cannot get Mr. Kemble to serve their purpose, they brand him as a liar, “and that he has sold his birthright as a truthful man for the mess of pottage ever offered by a politi-action iicheap dcenhance esty at t that rea:leen ke some slt;opinionto thinlabout it.Whal the rept “I. thiimemory*broken lt;only beSaxon vpressed and 1 rlt;bv thestances.wintervsalarv f«t-ure asupon liiiall refo• 1 \ ri \ !*eciaii.That to Mr. Kemble is exceed-hr-o-rl-ISingly unkind, but strictly in keeping with Breitenstein’s method of attack.He now tries to quote Dr. Kembleknowing something about householdgoods, etc. The Doctor informed me last Thursday, “that he knew nothingabout the transaction whatever, andwanted \V. W. Kemble to so notify theLedger and Mail.Now it looks to me and others that somebody, in order to injure me, are eating an unusual amount of dirt.lr. Kemble has given me a certificate over his own signature, “that the articles in the Ledger referring to him were unauthorized, and that Mr. S. II. Evansand himself were on good terms; thattheir business relations together had always been agreeable and satisfactory.”Yours Respectfully,S. H. Evans.money c “He e r of ate, aiu the flooi tracted 'votes en Senatorvote. Imonstra against;fused to scheme, into his as Ionsan applt;on condanotherbringino «with ojthe sailopinion the list fair pi a; decent ate the and a 1j isbimr il-ieGen. Phvok says the present Confed-Woi.i