Hide Article Text (OCR)
Che Hlarpit (Sajcttc.Local nM MtsoelknecmsWm. H . S M IT II. . . W ....... K D I T 0 K .Great Bargains in Groceries.Citizens of Morgan and of the adjoining counties, for a good article of groceries call and examine the number one stock at the old stand of W. It. llogshire Co. They are now in receipt of a large and well selected stock of groceries, which they are selling cheaper than any house in Indianapolis. They buy their goods in the eastern market for cash, which enables them to sell to customers at regular wholesale prices. They are selling exclusively for cash. Their store is centrally located and easily found—No. 25 West Washington, between Illinois and Meridian streets, Indianapolis, Indiana.For the Gazette.A Few Facts.9ra*Tlic following marriage licenses have been issued from the Clerk’s office : James A. Brick to Jane Brewer; Wm. Ferree to Sarah Ann Beeson; James M. Lewis to Sarah Jane O’tfarra; Wm; H. Drydcn to Mary E. Thornburgh ; Edmund Fisher to Elizabeth A. Stierwalt; Wm. H. Peters to Sarah Ann Cox; Clark C. Crandall to Hul-dak A. Johnson; Michael Musgrave to Vilena Egbert; James Dorsett to Matilda »Steene ; Charles Nelson to .Sarah 11. Howe ; John Thacker to Samantha Fry; Billips Parke to Nancy J. Edwards; Andrew J. Baker to Margaret J. Goss *r Thomas Taylor to Mary Kinkendall; David W. Glass-burn to Harriet E. Bishop; Solomon Easter to Charity Jane Carpenter ; John Cramer to Elizabeth Stewart; Hiram Ground to Man* A. Gregory; James Johnson to Nancy J. Smith ; James A. Mitchell to Rebecca Yocum; Eli N. Holsapplc to Sarah E. Harper; John T. Langley to Nancy Braham ; Clifford Wilson to Drucilla Reed (colored); John H. Evans to Martha J. Flowers; John C. McDaniel to Mary E.Compton-.KrcnenseA good joke is told at the expense0 .of one of the prominent citizens ot our county. A week or two since he went into«a neigboring county to marry him a wife, /‘sight unseen,” as the boys used to say. The courtship had been carried on thro’As everybody is talking about the election, we reckon we have just as good a right to have out* say as anybody else.— We will preface our remarks by stating that they are called forth by hearing the charge made that “all who refused to vote for Mr. Whitesett were disorganizes, andi ^disloyal to the party.” Now, we decline to vote for Mr. Whitesett, and yet we claim to be as loyal to our party as any man.— We do not oppose Mr. Whitesett on any personal grounds, for, as a man, we esteem him very highly. We admit that he was nominated by a convention, but we deny that he is the choice of the party. Not less than two-thirds of the party was opposed to his nomination, and a majority of the party are still opposed to him.We have yet to learn how a mah becomes disloyal to a party simply because he declines to vote for a man who was forced upon the party in defiance of his wishes, and the wishes of a majority of its members. It may be so, but we are unable to see it. Nor hre we able to- s'ee how the cause is to suffer by the defeat of the regular nominee. The record of either one of the opposing candidates is as good as that of Mr. Whitesett, and we ask any Sane man, how, in the name of common srmse,the cause is to lose anything by the election of either one of them? If Mr. Ruckle or Smith should be elected the o'Jlee will be tilled by a good Union man, a nd where is the loss to the party? You couldn’t see it if you had a microscope. If t wo or more persons, of the same party, o re candidates for the same office, a man does not forfeit his membership in the party by voting for an indedendent candidate, but is as true and loyal as he who votes for the regular nominee. But who arc the real disorgan-izers in this case ? \\'e charge it directly upon the clique who secured the nomination of Mr. Whitesett. They knew the party would not accept him^and their action has caused the disorganization, if any exists, and they alone should be held accountable for it.The cry of bolting comes with a bad grace from Mr. Whitesett and liis friends.At two different times has Mr. Whitesett bolted tho nomination of his party, and one of his most ardent admirers and pertinacious supporters—and who is exceedingly pert hi calling those who differ with him,boiFlour.WheatCorn,Corn IPotatoiihlasfSyrupOats, lt;Engs,BaconHamsShouliGlwirLoiIFreSi!
Newspaper Details
Martinsville Morgan County Gazette
Martinsville, Indiana, US
Sat, Sep 02, 1865
Page 3
Full Page
Clipped by
St C.
MO, USA 21 May 2018
Other Publications Near Martinsville, Indiana
Martinsville Weekly Gazette
Martinsville Evening Democrat
Martinsville Morgan County Republican
Martinsville Republican
Martinsville Democrat
