Hide Article Text (OCR)
I). 2 OF BAL-—1921)—Jacobopolitan Dry orporate. i 28th day of DOM HOODH. HENNIG- above cause ‘rsons having OUT AN DRY idy corporate, authenticated, : Court No. 2 e the 31st dayng a copy ofn some daily timore once a *ks before theJit STUMP.LEASANTS,a Clerkitors,street.OF BALTI-.)—The Unlti-ssociation vs.jurt of Balti-October, 1921, mentioned ini reported by*e, ?e ratibed the contrary ? the 28th dayii copy of this ily newspaper ce in each of ■ the 21st dayjut of sale toI1TEF0RD,Clerk.IITEFORD,Clerk.olicltor,OF BALTI-—Margaret It. in Wheeler, of said Court: ATION. is to procure monii by the *, from the de-heeler.oc22.29n5.12JOHN PLEASANTS.Clerk.Roy S. Bond. Solicitor, 215 St. Paul Place.IN THE CIRCUIT NO. 2 OF BALTIMORE CITY(B 470, 1921)—Viola Adams vs.James Adams.ORDER OF PUBLICATION.The object of this suit is to procure a decree for a divorce, a vinculo matrimonii, by the plaintiff from the defendant. The bill recites that the parties hereto were married in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on or about the 15th day of March, 1913, and lived together as man and wife until on or about the 15th day of June, 1913. That your oratrix is a resident of Baltimore, Maryland, and has been for more than two years prior to the filing of this Bill of Complaint. That the defendant is a nonresident of the city and state and when last heard of was in Birmingham. England. That though the conduct of your oratrix toward her said husband has been kind, affectionate and above reproach, he, without) any just cause or reason, abandoned and deserted her and has declared his intentions to live with her no more;that such abandonment has continued uninterruptedly for more than three years, is deliberate and final, and the separation of the parties is beyond any reasonable hope or expectation of a reconciliation. That there is one child as issue of said marriage, Marie Adams, aged six years, whose care and custody the plaintiff prays, and that she may resume her maiden name, Viola Hall.It is thereupon by the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City, ordered this 21st day of October, 1921, that the plaintiff by causing a copy of this order to be inserted in some daily newspaper, published in the City of Baltimore, once a week in four successive weeks, before the 22nd day ofNovember, 1921, give notice to the said absent defendant, James Adams, of the object and! substance of this bill,* warning him to be and appear in this Court, in person of by solicitor, on or before the 9th day of December, 1921, to show cause, if any he may have, why a decree should not be {passed as prayed, . .■H. ARTHUR STUMP.True copy—Test:JOHN PLEASANTS, oc22,29n5,12 Clerk.Benjamin Harm, Solicitor,FMUplifv P.ldirTrueoc22.2wIN 1 MOfer elOremorethattheseWIL1LIA3Vandtrary21stcopydailyonce fore I Thlt; be $1Trueoc22.iMartiTIIDscrCouriistrallatehavirheret the i to til of A law, estatare r Giver toberoc22,JTHISscrCourtrathlateh«r it
Newspaper Details
The Daily Record
Baltimore, Maryland, US
Sat, Nov 05, 1921
Page 4
Full Page
Clipped by
Anonymous
USA 21 Jun 2022
Other Publications Near Baltimore, Maryland
Baltimore Sun
Baltimore Daily Exchange
Baltimore Der Deutsche Correspondent
Baltimore Commercial Journal And Lyfords Price Current
Baltimore American Republican And Daily Clipper
