Hide Article Text (OCR)
its aminoney-:es the ] n this j nonth. i out, as cl and ( ncigli-o liand5 good tip rove ule are v devi-9rid of ) little tic use article icnsolvwutifier. ; or fa-• enso p andMrs. Molloy maintains that the much-maligned divorce laws of Indiana arc preferable to the statutes they displaced, which gave the husband about the sameauthority over his wife that a father has *now over his children, or a master over his apprentice. We incline to the belief that the truth lies between two extremes. Mrs. M. overlooks the fact that our laws stimulate connubial infelicity by permitting the parties to re-many. There can be no doubt that divorces are frequently sought by parties who would, in all probability, have been content with their first choice had they been deprived of the iiope of re-mating. In proof, we can cite frequent instances of second marriages occurring in a few daws after theo *granting of a divorce. With this exception. we cordially endorse Mrs. Mo Hoy’s views, and sympathize with her aspirations for freedom and enfranchisement. We cannot follow her remarks, but assure all who failed to attend the lecture that thev missed “a feast of reason.”IIENlHIGHLYFluidWill rarlicaScrofula. S.' byes, Sore I. chilis. Skin Unnnuigs fn mors. Panci Glandular S tor. Humors Dyspepsia. ; tahlishcd inHeing pri; plaints, iis 1 ter than an; li gives I In color and re: and puriiv. ail chronic c an impure s: hie and u.Vcc pains and ihe throat ai Kaye. Krysi|skin, and K •?!.5Jper ho
Newspaper Details
Rochester Union Spy
Rochester, Indiana, US
Fri, Mar 10, 1871
Page 3
Full Page
Clipped by
Larry W.
MO, USA 22 Aug 2017
Other Publications Near Rochester, Indiana
Rochester Mercury
Rochester Independent
Rochester Daily Republican
Rochester City Times
Rochester Indiana
