ATHENS, OHIO, TlIt.si root,ltag tol ! ! III!mayo*oak upa mini furnish c“oa lilark oatnag rutAn araiu{ h(rrrlt;M \s nbligr, Tine rustslect Thrafti hoFORCED WIFE’S NAMEiowiI ariv intult;1 isutuSensation Sprung by PlaintifTiin flowe Divorce CastYesterday AfternoonthethatfurthadNOW UP TO THE COURT I*won•*Another Woman Given) tttlHiDivorce After Hearing inCourt—Kyle Case TodayThe I iowe divorce case from Mol* I» \ i i ,i V(lidDtUtaklt;mm miH r m ci a i i j t t tMiutiUll V | lit? n it MHHiiit itfu? 11| tut* titHii tyerierdav afternoon after H had been in nnmnm about two da vs. (I ren tI ' ^ • Icrowds were in attendance at everysos• Ion, as fhe case was one of l to* wot st that has horn in the Athenscount v court a for several \ears from!■dllllii iht* standpoint of tin* «• v Idrnre.A number of business menrfronHaNelsonville testified as to thr valuei rh\ est/ *mw houseear, sitantiidae o*plasterind t r*tof thei »t tiemd (up11 St o\r )tn ther t it' sonirs. Lin-re in anot hit. hurt,r Jam as rted to by Karl* creek.»|t overwas nov oil throd startof thr property that Hiram L Howeowns and ail placed the total value less than did Mi ^ Howe. Sam Howea brother of Hiram, placed the highest vahta’ion upon it Bam Howe further said that about three mouths ago Mi; am had brought to him a paper somewhat like the contract andthat then it was not signed The witness did not know whethet it walt; fheli**rlt;fame paper that was Introduced In this trial by Howe. Bam Howe fur- of I declared that Mrs. Hiram Howe . 4eala a good woman. ; jts s®j mUK:Hutt illThree brothers of Mis Howe. Johnson b\ naiiic. went on the stand and®1 declared that the signaitti e to the|ani Tontiuct, .h ill.ie IP Howe was not 11 ,n written by their staler. j ^ 1The plaintiff then pul William (V ^lb ngelly, of (‘olumbus. a handwrit- .lug expert, on the stand. Mr. IVn- 'iikgelly is an expert of many years ex- 11perlence and has often been employ- ill® e*j by the government in cases where »an expert on handwriting is found®11* wilnecessary.®jl;. Peng'diy ?e*; ificd that in hisopinion tin* person who wrote the body of the contract’ also signed the mum of Jennie IP Howe to P in two places. On the stand Howe testified that he wrote the ’contract? which* was so nasty In its wording that it J was not read In court. Kxpert Pen-gellf then gave his reasons for his bedcf to the court and explained the Ii* CivicNow(1the Bov ‘ritiu tineclals tuit P, he-W it h the*i\*% Th •in out ageand thethe \1points in the writing that he sit id ii 'Acre similar.\t the conclusion of the testimony5Attorney John J. Lentz for Mrs. Howespoke briefly of tin* case. Ills O'# monition of Howe was, brief but inmercifully to the point. He ;plead that the court give Mis Howe lib* tl alimony with wfilc h iy live and ' dm cate her son, whose cu*tod the mother also seeks. Howe. * T * ;*ed. did not deny improper r la: ton-with other women while he did al j (erupt to st*al the good name of tie* mother of his son \ttorne Pcwi ; for Mr. Howe, made no remarks tothe court on the case at he cone lu-sion of the talk of Mr. Rent?,.ICS 11 Va n (!will)• v or tugcdals miAlonzo pit!cork hag brought suitIn common pleas court against JamesPideock. as adininisttator of theAtJuj\\SthahitoE Hu( Itaatriifee(nt« y*11* *it* a