VOLUME 52. NO. lt;$TRIAL GIVEN PRIVa£COURT HEARS TROUBLES OF WARRENrS ON THE QUIET.Divorce Action Had Some Very Rank Features—Hit Spouse Hid Nothing Under a Bushel.joceacafinFrta1;4-t8alt; •fi:ci:ovThe Boone Circuit Court l as oorne with a patience the almost ceaseless caravan of rank imposters, who have in recent months drilled up to the court room, and made existence miserable for the court attaches in their scurry to get a good sitting posture at some racey court proceeding, and on Monday last it was decided to close the doors upon the scene of the courts legal activities, when the case of Kathalene Warren against George W. Warren, for divorce, was called to be roasted to a Drown before Judge Willet H. Parr. The attorneys generally thought the privacy of a court hearing would be the better course of procedure and it was the first trial that has not been publicly heard for some time.On Sept. 28, 1910, Mrs. Warren entered through her attorneys, Jones Murphy, of Crawfordsville, and S.M. Ralston, of this city, a suit in the Boone Circuit Court, for a separation. On Jan. 16, 1911, Mr. Warren, by his counsel, Johnson Johnson, of Crawfordsville, filed his answer, and cross complaint to her averments.Mrs. Warren in her testimony offers up her husband to some rather rank exposures and her open statements to the court Indicate that George was all he was and then) I . some.Mr. and'Mrs. Warren prior to taking up residence in this city in May, 1910, resided on a farm, near Englewood, and his wealth was put at $26,000. While holding a residence there, however, he became unjustly | i iealous of her and began a vicious treatment of her. She left him and took up her home with Sadie E. Hyde, a niece, at Richmond, and with 1 i her conducted a boarding house in that city. Mr. Warren tnen reviewed the situation, visited her in Richmond, and sought to induce her to return to him. A few propositions in common were agreed upon and the reunion was perfected. Shortly after that they moved to this city and it was while living in this city on East Main street, that she found Mr. Warren no longer endurable, and put the soft pedal on his cruel treatment with a divorce action.Evidence in the case was concluded Wednesday aiternoon, after three days of gruelling cross-examination. Several letters which the defendant wrote to the plaintiff when iie a as *‘by his lonesome*' were introduced in evidence, and the epistles, some seven in number, were good for onelaugh each at the least on reading. The mirth the letters were preductive of served well the purpose of a* tending partially, for the unfit testimony.On Wednesday word was received by the Johnson Bros., attorneys for the defendants, that their sister-in-law^ was dead, and the arguments in the case were continued indefinitely, owing to the crowded condition of the court calendar. Witnesses produced by the defense were Ora E. Warren, son of the plaintiff, Lena Lynn, and Eva Warren, his nieces, and McClelland Warren, a nephew\ all of Crawiordsville. Others were Mrs. Joseph Airhart, of Englewrood, and John Line and Harry Chadwick.. The last three named persons testified as to the domestic relations between the two as observed by those when they lived at Englewood. Miss Lena Lynn testified as to the generosity of Mr. Warren, and if her statements are to be considered he