It Ul SUIUU mwic uaj.District Court—May 19.—Charles II-Miller vs R. M. Shoemaker ct al, orderof continuance set aside and cause dismissed lit plaintiff s costs. -Qiiati-.ijuah• sup* pc qu ah, councilor of the Sac * Fox Indians vs Thomas Murphy, Albert Wiley, Thomas Dorwin and\V; P. Montgomery* Dismissed as totustwwy vlocated :sold in t oh reaso ness-lot Massachan-)i. •*K-Orr( Wau-iiam-mo^diicf of Fox trili brfn-;diaus ys same defendants, and same orderas Vr• Man-a-to-whhi' houhcilor Sac ; Foxtribe ofTndiaiis rs same~defendaats. ■ Dis*bonSnS^^*% J01?armmst'^lbej^rWiley. ?iVerdict of the jury $500:foF plaintiff* against- defendant Wiley. ^plaintiff; AH. Foote for defendant. Capt. ChristianThe ai of the L ton Rail of tbirtcof otherof the C' on Mom my!9lt;j Tub ato the a’* *isain, an er part lt;tile-mei \fho usejdbkK - l! mhde a very long,-'elaborates'and i'oniton*«*I«!:: argumenU^hich^ Uic^coMt :*nff ju*y' listened to with marked-attention;tion^br!vt»rce^fTriat by cbiirtiahd de-cree of divorce granted; - v,1All- kandmtfatisfacN. Bremon:Old clotfcejpwcpet m