JAMES INGLES IS VICTOH IN DISCUSSION LEAGUE CONTESTift51111I1ritJohn Henderson and Walter Bar nett, of West Newton, Tie for Second PlaceMr. Otto, as chairman of the« V 'Discusion League Contest, held in the Study Hall last Friday made a short explanatory address relative to the contest. He said that under the rules, the boys were not to receive any coaching and that the judges were to base their judgment on effective discussion, being left free to de-termiue what constitutes effectivediscussion, considering boththought and delivery.The topic was “A New Constitution for Indiana.’1 GabrielKirowitz, the first speaker, tnade a striking speech. His plan was to embody a liquor clause in the constitution ahd to turn the prisons into JJospitals.Walter BaTnett, of West Newton, argued that the state has outgrown its constitution and that it is a barrierflio progress.Sumner Mj^s, another visitor, convincingly declared that the short ballot, the initiative, the refeftndutn and the recall are conductors offering the least resistance to^the expression of the popular will.James Ingles, the second Short-ridger, made a powerful impression when he declared that just as the state buildings have 1 been abandoned because of inadequacy to meet the necessary wants, so the present constitution* must meet a similar fate.John Henderson, the lastspeaker, made a critical analytical 1 dispassionate speech in which he t expressed the opinion that there is no necessity for revolutionary t measures to secure the desired I reforms. Evolution should take* the place of revolution.The rebuttals were beautifully clear and exemplary inbrevity. The debaters rebutted in the same order in which they spoke. G. Kirowitz declared that total abolition of the liquor traffic is imperative. W. Barnett made the point that we need a flexible constitution. S. Mills finished the case for West Newton bydirecting his rebuttal against John Henderson whom he called re-actionary and who he declared had shown the necessity of enough reforms to warrant the calling of a convention.J. Ingles, in a masterful and brilliant metaphor compared the present constitution to an oldCONCLUDED ON PAGE FOURPirtcItoVon:Ftlt;IVirwclt;flt;aicle;ECbmGnaiBRH\XaisiP«MhiSiccnlt;FachiteBlfoPiofTitapluiit2:wfr