THE CUMbtF1Judge’s Opinion(Continued ttom Page *4)of the prufrt ity is fur more thawould he riceived if it were sol for farm j»unK,M and more tha/ Yf\K/fniid hr rerel% f ci if if werleetd( xdotjed and sold at* llpir mI lil[ t4 - f, f «!tedhanof ifn thehfi 11’prop* TtThe i enno doubt that the proposed sal® i all romemed trv~ ovinmd1 thati fis most unlikely that 11n fit’able offer will againiUtlbr* i. {* lt;* j v cd hi f he fti tur fv.f - i*a rlt;** *Af; f 11a fa,.I Cl I ! -f i I “ f t ’ * dH h*« ff fne r4 -Hi * it itrfl ’ tJrlll‘I)u* ft-. _f ni*i *i mgof/ fOifcl I'HpK I jphu---------»th«u ehild? lt;n ir i«otheprevi#U5sale1, the■ y W #s'remadlt;. andone vhieh whieh bythe 1jfei eftri n*hild.rlt;re All! oftherrd%f hii t lt;H ^h a .*s hr # Unlt; ofth#'four Ineri v * ri Ifehddr# ni ?i nrlity of the diMtt to the deanif*nf riod thenvMdvi.....WM* M ri-amrhtklren*# theJildge iwifitinnedc f ntm iliii iisSwfi•i! idr^ H* ride? ordif ♦-Pill?!edkmf t \ i ■i h e t r u $ I * * e ff i be ft p (M# (H f e€* b'the court • will he ordered to joti in the deed from the proento the Pittsburgh Plat#Company conveying th#tir * ■ 7 if hi*; I v cofiveyid t#o(,Vjl tn r kI * ,rihthi a ne r fiftn rtv U n.mt andthMMA/ll lt;11 »i * rn* 11 lt;*to# It*ii iuf i j y |j i» m a i it I y if * 0 r lt;* • ,0* ?tie rundf fm lt;t* 1 v for th#m 11 Hitenaat# ® ;«nd comfort olRalt; he! Blot i„ Ih* ‘ ♦ h«1# s wouldhave b#en approved i#t the timehv tho- c ourt had the question beenbefore it The purchaser* of theseproperties bnirjtit them hi g^»olt;ifaith and have iroprovfd then* invarious wlt;« y^ Sueh sales ran nowhe ratified 'nunr pro tunc ^ h deti i frt #uf # tit