|DISGRACEFUL DIVORCt SUIT'11 i i I'■ ~Parties Charge Each Other With Open Adultery.NEITHER GIVEN A DECREE.Judge King Regards the Airing: of Dirty Linen as Unfortunate—A Doctor in tlie Case—Hearing of Insane Patient Proceeding Continued —Absorbing Ti ial at St. Georpe— Non-Pnrtisau Iteception to Bartcb.In the Fir*t District court yevtUrday Judfiv King heard the lt;nslt;': of Olive 13 Haight vy. t.eorge Ti. Haight, a diagram ■ fu 1 divorce »uit from I. IntaU county.Plaintiff began *ult on the groundsof cruel tr« it»n«*nt. and ^K lt;1 flt;r thocustody of .t minor child Defendant rled ii, crisK-coinr*l.»liU. and wmRd a dl%'«!i • i»n tit* . I'.Jiind adultitj ti I Rh*‘» lt;1 lor the niMody f the child To \ -\vi r * nmrrk'i Do-mb'T 1!, and i'lt; id* o t tlm** in Our.iPlalntlfJ i tld of oni: • thr e j . irs ago whlt; n da’i ndant struck lv r, and said ofii-n u;is Jacking for the noces*sark*.'- of life.Plaintiff prov«:d d* r^mi'mt had oa« n )-• ri out \sllh one I-1 ' Ii* .Jricl 0 uxi on* * th* \\ • re i-i'i-n i lt;-nt' r the 1 k room of a hous*.* i'»gethlt;.i No criminal foiiin■ ■ t lou had, been n b*.‘tw n the t\\ *I»‘ f«:rr • put two wiim *es *n th* rdand, Mlrs k ttle Jackson and .Mi. I’itt- n \vh*» Ih ■ had n MrsJialght hu-. lug criminal intcixlt; ucm-with i )r •' • tii i■ f \ « i i ll.Ml parti s proscut lt;1 • 1 • I the criminal intimacy (h rv il, and l)r J oathundertook to r« :i i fr »;n a in»: iiior.t ad aI “Ok t‘» pi'oVv h»* h oi ■ ilt;' !■ •■a at h*-house on the 12th «lt;f May l.'^t, whenII wa.i »lainv lt;1 tin vvni* i had ■ ?en th* to 1 The book ?ho\v lt;1 he had not ( n 11 *'• 1 there then, hut ui* 'all lor pro-f* 's|nnal ..-all- proved difi'ntlyTh court thought it very unf»r*u-nntc th v' !• much dlrtv line ti n i b* *n alr« d. iail hlt; folt thu ii *Ue had pr*ven adultery. Miss Jieke v ho t rtlh*’d to ill rrimiii i intimacy u tw* n thlt; doctor ip. 1 Mi' Haight the roui I th lUKht wan i it»t• i‘ t’-'t , :n*iy Mr*lt;. 1*. ‘ton’s tlt;: .-Mnv.ii/ w.iS not fre« from douhlAnni fl • M C r,* is!