FILTHYI In1 Domestic Infelicities ofMr. uud Mia. Haight.iOn tb« I’ftrt of Both Hu^bnnd And Wi/«— No Oood From rh» At^nigr oft Their Trouble* in Court—Th* ‘’Mson-eLners” fiend Not Guilty OiherBuni-n*”B#The long drawn out town of VernaliHtrlf'V *HilJ «»«*»»*Hlrlcl court anilCiiHH WBKmg In ihe Judge Kiuc took the same under ad-11IIThe next business taken up was divorce* proceedings between Olire J* Llaigbt and George l* Haight ol nai. Mrs Haight filed complaint tor aiv^rce alleging cruelty and adultery. The husband filed a cross complaint alsoalleging adultery ami the evidence as it prog re 8308 before Judge Kin#, develops a very dirty anlt;t disgusting mees. Mrs. Haight undertakes \o prove that her husband committed adultery with oce Miss J ickson whom she woald s«*em to aecCuae of having been '*atthe For*/' on aAmines* C V)* and wasdriven away from there by theofficers. Mr. Haight undertakes toprove that his wife gadded about be-t ween Fort Pu Che»ne and Ouray and ; it other olives mid lias committed adultery witti one Dr. Booth and diners other people. Witnesses for* the bo* (land assert tliat they saw i the wit’e in the act of committimr aouiterv with Dr liootb The case 3 was tried behind Closed doors andI: well it migbL be*I f e^aet instie were done it woald. hh-ui that i h parties ought to betaken btlore the vrrai)d jd*y. l'he plaint AT is a fair looking little woman who bat, to say th** foaat, bees very in*discreet in her actions with tnen other , , than her husband, particularly a mar- I * ned m m named Woodard, another named fit. lenbell as well as Dr. Booth-Sbe has a hitle child* a son i-'-yisate~oid unci altogether it ib aaaii s*»d case. Tr aIvfii cannot possibly live together* The father ia a mu B fairly well Used 11 nanciallr. The rnutUer is I rail and suffera iaucii with ill brUtb. It bus deve*|j I ed in the case that her conduct witli rt-hprfi to llt;t*F child would lead tot e eoncliieiun that cm* i« not overly well stocked with love and affection lor her t* uia, SUe h t’i none i u her husband, j Out Isas lor Woodard. The husband ,t seeme has foe«n paying his attentions to Mias Jackson. It is a tsoufused mesa*nd hard im determine whiob should have puHtodv of the Child*Tb£ jaifce in camming \iv eaid that the . v’tdenre i-ad not l^en such as to convict Mr. 11 might beyond « reatonable doubt ot bavin# tom mi tied adultery with Mias JackhoDi He had been uu* kmd wttli hia wile at times, but ebe.kH provoked much ol L!*^t unkmdneae by her undiSeieet i-onducl. to the wife h m ti t been proven guilty olhnviiiki c i*d adoitery with MrInabeil* A.ra Jackaon and Mrs, l*at-ton testify to having aeen ner and Dr.B-jolh tn the act* Uias Jackson le iu* lerest* d in the 'reduit of Lbe case and bi-r e.videolt;36 must be taken with con-atdemt*leaiiowan•Mrs. Pattlt;*u’sstory and Mb-; Jackeon’g agree as to the fact, nut vary widely in the details. Tb^re is a doubt in thecourt's mind oh to the irutn of it.nnderail the cireumatanccB. Decree of di* vorce WiiS not granted, but the case i waa disimssed at defeijdnnt’e costTh Doct r Booth in the case is aman past eixty years ol atte. very hwartbv and with rather a treacherous eyu in bis head. D. D. HouU, attorney tor Mr. llight, in bia arjfument, turned to the doctoi and denounced bim most Hralhiogly as a lecherous beast worthy of tlu* contempt ol all men,JisStu«cdcaitJetIJiIitI\ii£tI1L'iy' i%a.sfiJ