willing tnere suouin ue a divorce, ami aignau a papo acknowledging her guilt.The Court granted a decree on the ground of aduiterjBlackburn for petitioner.A HU SB AI TOO FAT TO WORK FOR BIS WM IX HOWEATHER.Mary Ackermann vs. Geome Ackerxnann. A suit fodivorce on the ground of willful absence. Thepnrlle wore married in Cincinnati on ihe 8th of May, 1871 and have one child, aeed ioar years.The lather of the plaintiff testified that after the tnai riage Ackermann and his wile lived a month in hi bouse. The defendant, dmlng this time, did notgiv his wife any money or work any. At the end of th month the witness asked him what was the matteithat he did not get work. His reply was that ho coutnot work that kind of weather: it was too hot. Witnea then ordered him to leave his house, but as he was no disposed to do so, a constable had to put him out. H did not furnish his wife with nnything to eat. Afteleaving the bouse of witness, the parties lived togetliesix months.Court—Who supported your daughter during that simonths'?Witness—She worked herself and I helped her all th time. Her husband did nothing from the beginnin, until this time,Court—Was he able td woTk if be got work? Witness—Certainly; be was a good cignr-maker and molder, but is one of the laziest fellows in this crty. offeted to give him a recommendation where be couh get work, but he declined, and said: “I’m too fat. can’t worn this hot weather.”George Cook, when asked wbat was the cause of tb separation, replied that the defendant was a lazy fellou and could not supports wife. The character of th plaintiff was that of an industrious woman. Sh worked in a tailor’s shop. •Cose not disposed of.Jessup for plaintiff.TUVORCB SLIT CONTINUED ON THE GROUND THAT PLAT?