Court Receives Divorce LibelsThe following divorce suits were instituted yesterday with the tiling of libels in court at Hollidaysburg.Hetty Marh* Berkst. res.se r vs. Ralph M. Rerkstresser; Hetty Jane Miller vs. Reuh**n Nicholas Miller; Christina A. Yeager vs. Arthur L. Yeager; Jane 11 i/a bet h Nail vs. Fred Richard Nail ; Marian Longstreth vs. Harry Longstreth: Lillian D. Wohlbruck vs. Carl W. Wohlbruck; Dolores Faye Swope vs. Harry Edward Swope; Barbara Schultz vs. John M. Schultz, jr.; Ruth Pauline ('linger vs. Waiter James (linger; John S. Murray, jr., vs. Annuhellc Louise Murray; Woodrow Wilson vs. koxanna Wilson.Mast ers’ reports recommending divorce were filed in the following suits:Tline Hazel Howard vs. Franklin I,. Howard, prior marriage; Miriam A. Thompson vs. Frederick R. Thompson, desertion; Elsie M. Lightner vs. William 1*. Lightner, indignities; Francis (\ Berkcy vs. Helen Florence (Dodson) B« rkey, cruel and barbarous treatment; King II Rose vs. Betty E. Rose, morals off. use; Harry A McCartney vs. Mildred Louise McCartney, desertion; Elsie c. Farrell vs. James T. Farr* II cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities.