Hide Article Text (OCR)
PE.Cm ASM SJMBBAS.tsebanSott'if.*ANDlanding at the timo of tho ruUudlcailtmoT the bonkrupta*. m tckieh cuch bank-.Wpf-w d.pitrttfi Ui itla own name, in the same manner and tsitH the. likp. effeeti a»Tis* ». v * -* 1“®* I?5?ht proAeeotod bf dtf-I« v*F*,loC‘he Cttiie4 .• rates coin fended, by such bankrupt;'’ Itf otheV to Jt£?£rf£5* J*1*1* ,r*‘,or •*«*«**»#•»* words, as to tho estate raid pronertv ofJf b -SB^iriSfflSSSSf £?$£ ft^lSiS?PW,lbJ^»«aaaB2r-°frJ”u «/•* — iSOt S'SS:.forenoon, Judge McCaiffllest deilveted train proceedings.therein^by injunction i no foluvwing opinions in cases in btujk-’ °* °t“® ptoceas* riroehieHs jo take prop-ruptcy, arising before Win a short liiao S ^L0jL!to i*r fWssiononUrinr’11^ dwblons *” of moru ^ f Finding no rach crant o£ power, either ordinary importance, sottling, astfcby id direct terms or by necessary implica*llo 1% « ■ I tn^lt ^ ’1,1:1..*.' ^..1.1 1 .1 :W . tlnn fV/llY% UHtf A? »Un ~ ’ J# ..ions of the«««, titling aa a Court of In the matter of credfto.,,'trrlart Hugh Campbell a bankruptt.. .7” T'”1 .*y “''wwiau ..Vuuvu«ii3.iu jiuuuar cases.; *?J*wer of creditora petition.'to I 1 hvo not submitted this ophilOhtdtnAruptfi .“y Drotlief Grier,' but It- may bo a tforirce* V i I OI lrntlflfHil(nn fViit a. i.. .Unlived- - - -w «*/««• r -I. ---- UUIH‘ may uu nsonrcoJudge Mcb'atidless delivered the .1-|?« frirtlficalkm to the profuse]on to teamlowid* optalonY-' “ S ' rcco'‘tI-' “tClr-. LvJ opp* 4,1I mJartelpUia, we conferred upon * this case, and r am pleased to say thatLisolsAm-Cot-tiicionstoy-Itad1W.on*igaricodperarts.tu-e*i40ilt;ls.1 H11’.?™',0 HaponslbUlty.,WwU»tiftchea to Um decision .about, to be »a*•*» ‘'omUminjrsnew, .am* rtaled Statute, and establlsbtnK tin}-1 tlee to Ik* observed inite proper adn mruUon, there most necessarily bem '^versify of opinion among both law aha judge*. The itdereats involved frequently bo large, and thoprinclphimportaut, that ineitrlcdbta tomb ruusfc.result from an unsound inter taiion of. the legislation of Congraw, This Bankrupt Act is, in my judgmAn highly beneficial to both tho debtor- andthe creditor. It was designed to relievethe one Item onprewlve Itabliltim wh~render him unfit. to.spatrlbuta tothei auctlve wealth of tho eothit^, itcd m fori Ik to the other an assurance thattoo property of tho debtor, except w from motives of humnnity, ho is i*,,-mmed m retain, almll bohomwllv defo-led to the payment ot his debts. * With aipiin k . I.* a. • • _ * — iv aay ujai•^tC?.uIc.lu',r0ti.S?1110 ieftal principles upon drhJch it should bo decidod.InjonctiQu dissolved.This case wds tffgfted by.Mr^tinier,'miy bemdeh j for. nnd by Mr. Painter, ^r;.(foldWandboth lawjfpre lt;»c». Foster; against tho injunction.CdV1 ‘JiW 1 * ■ ...____QUKSTlOIf OK KOAUD COKSWEBKD.Tn the. District (hurt of the United State*./•'I- the Wiwtam DiMriet ef JPenn*ylva~hm, Aittiiiiiai il Viurt Bankruptcy;In the matter of William Burris^ a Petitioner for adjudication in JJankruptci/. ot the firm of,S. W. Jiumc.Judge McCandlesK delivered the fol-lowing opinion:This case win* argued at the »ame time with that of JTttgh^^ill, and the been thereprineijial pdint presentdecided.........It dlilors in this—Bums In a voiuutary bankrnpL . Jlis pcUtion was filed on theMTif nr .ln!w *10/r?? -I*• -__ j..».....%on-rU-iticro-ird2U*i and surrender of hi# u«setaibr the Itit ofhls cmiltbrs, under peril of im oBincut for cont^mpL \v‘ “ *Court* of the United State*not to be disregunltHl.'' ; j |tfUlv w. IUH»amefhi*protest Ik h case upon oreditArs I klo'wh a iv _ . , ,Skrapff o?5Sk I sKriffSf Jeffersoney have lieedhs9t«tetJ,, till or whichS^^^ISfSSI^ssJThi‘h°rft.tbVbrnl^^^^V^^^n2 Uie mh of Ju]y,isu7, obtaimii Judgmente*. tea pomUty i mwn warrant of altdrncv, dated 0th or»,x,a -VCAr' (orlb? »«• ofar-ayilu»**IrsfiOtid-ed*n-ildrb-ooWLro-hLmon Ph*a* of Armstrong county,. andI “»!• ™aorlroml7e-io*i7o™;militn. Upo ffl out u MTU of *««»«lt;»*. but to bo |ield asestate by.tK§heXhS^ ^de IS -k! l° .air‘mI tbe ftrm’ of?i3)^5K) renlizoii and brdugti? Sta jSlSt.Hlu b!Ulkr“Pt *« 11 partner, anfor distribution. Under cliwS*. *S2no.stnncea ■ our extrnordimirv-Dower of in 1 creditors. That la vfolstionjunction \v»sInvoked (nrMtrsfTt [uf-thte agreement, and in frond of theihoSS.aSWfiSjSSSSS; taf® ff'W of tUa 2s**1*!*CooTtaKif thBSitate and 5Sr cxSmS! I !hJ! Judgment was entered, execution;?nkrupf .toUii.Ojjjj - Wlwgtjjrrtlwr**itt-:oltQ.»lie's5Vtf-Uat2kriipt0%% (rVdivUioii nmoocmU ^U^rediujrs. -The*iDjimctlou agjanst'Jh^Sheriff'and Cho parties wtuigrAiited, with leave for a motion to -duMKrfr*.tliatwe might juicertaiD whether- uoderthe Ijttnkrapt Ww, w« hutn «he xighi to interfere with tho Court* of tho StaU^'Iti.thelogltiip^ccx^t^oftheirfoncUdm.AJtcr tpjuch. reffcctiyti'T am SdKitadiWo»|Tho first awrtion uf the .Vet ia.wid^ Inu* MOIMV-Jna would see'dita^rint^llW11^ .aiu^ SotereitB ooimectiKlwith the BAukinsfst Ipto a common'fijfimlt;r c»nu*r. And t*'do »d# it W coatehBed th*t Conjwnw by imjdiTOdon. olt;mM)r«diilHiik unrJMstrict Court* of riit UoftcdsawnderrealnudE*tS.if•States the authority to suspend «h #*d cvorv prnweding lt;4adwher^*ud « ^ mand obedjpnoe to th^iir mandat ‘riusiyewm other jarteiltctimw.by yirtuo of ttm clatuw of the Rthftcm or 41m i*t-Article of the Conntr«, granting theto establish nnifiirm laws on tiV?1. S . l«J‘kruntcii»i- ihroiurbnui kedStatOmgr«.,as haa thet ^I'A'^ttheyttavo noromwTftj;-—^-.. P them in tho-lhoe-was the Act of tho -Al orMaroh, I7«L SotsOon f,th, cx-reealy declaring MnoriAall wwfit or In-nnctlon be grab tod to rtay proceedings m any Court, of a /Stout” / There ‘ia n«K.a*tlicm to- daUtor theirs prowjrtv, upon which tho levy was modft, to iheattjgneo m bankruptcy. This we did, tit thoft»mo Umo.admoniidung Coimaol bftliadoubih : entertained ok tri tho power of this Court, and Huggtwiing a motion to dissolve, which wosirrnnted. Upon this Wild they have been fully heard, and tharquestion has been derided to-day tn Campbell'* eAv:It was urged, with great force and ability, l»y the Counsel for tho bankrupt, thru wo were bound to interfere, by imnnctlun, because this was-not a. vUitl juogxnent. But hnsr do we know that? ft ti« entered in n Conrt of competent ja-rlrdk-iiau, whcM? authority it is oar duty to respect. ?f St 1* fraudulent, of Void ^tinder the Bankrupt Insr, it is. tbe prov-inoe o£ the asaiguee In bankruptrr, who•tandaln tiie attttudc^if a defendant, to160,^1^ that forum, that no Injustice is ykStio to thiogaoeral creilUors- ,Sy the ftmt section of the fbnrth arti-■cleof the ConstitffUtm of the. l/ffltsd a, Jhis-deditrod Unit fmlflirnsWfiliS^rlogs of kvery other Jftaichad*•and this isequally binding on tbe ^Courts of the UnitedStates.t-i.We must, therefore, refer tio assignee. v s -----• ^ .. , a
Newspaper Details
Pittsburgh Gazette
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US
Tue, Oct 15, 1867
Page 1
Full Page
Clipped by
Carnegie L.
Pennsylvania, USA 21 Sep 2020
Other Publications Near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh Daily Pittsburgh Gazette
Pittsburgh Daily Morning Post
Pittsburgh Catholic
Pittsburgh Zajednicar Fraternalist
Pittsburgh North Hills News Record
