Ul O * .uvuCase James William Kidd vs Ward E Turnbull Damag(‘ of $10,000 are asked bv the p’ainr.ff who states that the defendant did ut'fullv destroy and alienate from the plaintiff the af-fecMons then had b\ ’he 'aid Mar-gaM* A Kidd, ’he wife of Jame* William Kidd ’ The defendan* i' named as core-i)ondent in a dhorce rase to the October term of Janus WilliamKidd vs Margaret A Kidd