VENICE COUPLE IN A PECULIAR SUITA novel quest inti in alimony was presented Io the Circuit Cmirt. .lodges in Cincinnati Friday liy AumneyEs J. D. Crolt;3i1 and L. G- liummel In tlie ease of Frederick a and Jacob Schradin. The latter is a farmer at Venice and is 70 years old, while his wife is Tr. In ISC'l Mrs. Sell ratlin nurd for alimony, charging her* Imnband with-having i!riven her from home, liv consent, of both parties she was given $1,000. They lived a pari until 3901, when the old men mot with an accident, mid, ilL | his request, slie nursed him to health. They became reconciled and lived together again. .For a second lime Mrs. Sell rad In was driven from home hy her husband, and she tiled jl second suitfur alimony. Attorney Creed, ■ for Sell rad in, claimed th,e first payment cjf alimony concluded all her claims against him and a second suit was not maintainable. Attorney 2-lurfiniei contended the first alimony was only forthe lifo of either party or until I hoy luaminu reconciled. The latter having occurred, and Mrs. Schradin being driven forth again, she was entitled to alimony for a second time. Judge Davis knocked out Hummel on a demurrer filed by Creed, and the ease was taken to the Circuit Court on error and argued Friday. The problem is a novel cue. and was taken,under advisement by Judges Swing, Gillen and Jelke,