market yes-s lower, and wer to ten lesslon. werequiet witho 7.n the localm555555657075808590950005Friday5.40*5.455.50a 5.55 5.55*5.60 5.60a5.655«5a5.70§.70*5.755.80*5.855*90*5! 95 5.95*0.00 6.OOa0.O5as no quot-today in the ted easy ath lake quot-I Jake qi12.75al3.00;spelter atSEPTEMBER TEE-.. ,4891—Louis Karat® et al. vs. Nathan Se contract. P. Reilly. . „4896—Benjamin M. Miller vs. Rapid Tran si Co.: damages. H. M. Miller and A. S. Ash bridge. — ^4915-E. F. Rogers Co. vs. Dragon Auto mobile Co.: contract. J. A. Boyer.muaj matthe refusal la addicted a rule on t sons. FranCoart So 3bert H. Lainz; same.|dll wasn/i o i*DECEMBER TERM.236—Charles Kreamer Sampson vs. Martha C.Sampson; divorce. Ruby R. Vale.239—Lydia Lainz vs. All Warren C. Graham.241—Sophie Cosgrove vs. John F. Cosgrove;same. Frank H. Mullen.245— Leon H. Eaton vs. Ella C. Eatoo; same. John C. Marsh.246—John G. Vollmer vs. Harriet Vollmer; same. Evans St Forster.284—Samuel Gorson vs. Rapid Transit: damage#. Monaghan Phillips.285—John Tait vs. C. 8. Robland; same.Same.309—Thomas Earley, assignee. etc., vs. James Johnston et al.; mortgage. R. J. Ear-318—Hovrett-Warren Co. vs. William Graham Co.; contract. J. B. Colohan. *321—W. Redsinski vs. Andrew Wojner et al.: damages. C. P. Sterner.336—8. E, Brown vs. William Deasey; appeal. L- Hutt.• 342—William Bladworth vs. I. Warren May; contract. 8. Scoville, Jr.343—Mary G. Evans vs. Solomon Slonlmsky et al.; mortgage. Forater.345-J. Jacob Shannon Co. vs. G. 8. W. Brubaker Co. et al.; contract. W. HoraceLaw Schoo practice belMerchSpecial to Tblt;WILKESN. Rutter, merchaut it terms as;morninar olaged 67 ye record andfor carryinjfield under—TheNalHepburn.352—Burr Hardwick vs. B. I* Solomon1Manufacturing Co.; same. C. W. Conurd.362—Baldwin S. Sk L Association ▼*. JosephMcDonald et al.; mortgage. William H. Shoe-CAPITAl