*NEW SUITS FILEDCOUHT OF COM MOM PLEAS A 86021—Cleveland Burnley vs. Alice Burnley. For divorce and cuatody ofchild,A66022 Rov R. Daughtee vs. Evelyn' S Da ugh tec. For divorce.A 86023 George Camp vi Industrial Commission of Ohio. To assess compensation. • \ ;A66024 -Application of ; First Antioch Baptiit Church for authority to mortgage real estate.A86Q26—State of Ohio v*. Gilman Jackson. Petition in error filed.A66026—Same vs, Joa^Wiliiams. Petition in error filasL A66027—Randall SchaUman vs. Rosella Schatzman. For divorce. “v.A66026—William Bushelman Jr. vs, Mildred Bushelman. For divorce.A86026- Harry. Hood in vs. Minnie Blais, to 8etf aside th# conveyance of property* A66030— Ernestine J. Cameron vs. Frank Cameron. For. divorce*A66031—Helen P... Meyers ye.. Ernest Meyers. For divorce. 'Amm Edith B. Kline vs. Fred J. Kline. For divorce and custody of child, A a«03J-~Earl J, Pope vs. Christine Pope.for divoioe. ~ • ~• ;A66034-^'Frank Jackson vs. MuniItCM*, for 62,000 as damages.AtWWfas- Thoda Streavel vs. Walter L. Itreavek for dtvorce.A «603lt;‘ -Altns B. Schmidt vs, Eugene Berningbania Co., tor dissolution of corporation and appointment of a receiver. A66037—Ralph Monroe vs. iMary Mon-rof Jar diBwri.A66036 -Helen Fields vs. Ortar Fields.y of child.A66039 — Constance rrtdks vs. Charlesfor divorce and cuatody of ch!F. Fricke, for divorce and custody ofddMBi*a 86040Dave Barbiesvs. Industrial Commission of Ohio, to assess compen-satton 'A66041—Frank Garrett vs. Mattie Gar-rett* mdUvecco. .A46042—Edna E. Hamby vs. Waiiam A.Hamby, for divorce.