Article clipped from Cincinnati Times Star

*NEW SUITS FILEDCOUHT OF COM MOM PLEAS A 86021—Cleveland Burnley vs. Alice Burnley. For divorce and cuatody ofchild,A66022 Rov R. Daughtee vs. Evelyn' S Da ugh tec. For divorce.A 86023 George Camp vi Industrial Commission of Ohio. To assess compensation. • \ ;A66024 -Application of ; First Antioch Baptiit Church for authority to mortgage real estate.A86Q26—State of Ohio v*. Gilman Jackson. Petition in error filed.A66026—Same vs, Joa^Wiliiams. Petition in error filasL A66027—Randall SchaUman vs. Rosella Schatzman. For divorce. “v.A66026—William Bushelman Jr. vs, Mildred Bushelman. For divorce.A86026- Harry. Hood in vs. Minnie Blais, to 8etf aside th# conveyance of property* A66030— Ernestine J. Cameron vs. Frank Cameron. For. divorce*A66031—Helen P... Meyers ye.. Ernest Meyers. For divorce. 'Amm Edith B. Kline vs. Fred J. Kline. For divorce and custody of child, A a«03J-~Earl J, Pope vs. Christine Pope.for divoioe. ~ • ~• ;A66034-^'Frank Jackson vs. MuniItCM*, for 62,000 as damages.AtWWfas- Thoda Streavel vs. Walter L. Itreavek for dtvorce.A «603lt;‘ -Altns B. Schmidt vs, Eugene Berningbania Co., tor dissolution of corporation and appointment of a receiver. A66037—Ralph Monroe vs. iMary Mon-rof Jar diBwri.A66036 -Helen Fields vs. Ortar Fields.y of child.A66039 — Constance rrtdks vs. Charlesfor divorce and cuatody of ch!F. Fricke, for divorce and custody ofddMBi*a 86040Dave Barbiesvs. Industrial Commission of Ohio, to assess compen-satton 'A66041—Frank Garrett vs. Mattie Gar-rett* mdUvecco. .A46042—Edna E. Hamby vs. Waiiam A.Hamby, for divorce.
Newspaper Details

Cincinnati Times Star

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

Wed, Nov 24, 1943

Page 15

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Cincinnati A.

OH, USA 21 Mar 2023

Other Publications Near Cincinnati, Ohio

Cincinnati Kentucky Times Star

Cincinnati Christian Age

Cincinnati Israelite

Cincinnati North Journal

Weekly Cincinnati Times