p occcdingBut J 15 U gc-d b the P alnttfT thcL the I hlgm dee cs Is not I gal and binding on h-r hi»cAu«o this domic lc of a s h st w fe was in \e A \c r. Sta e and he defendant Jnl an BroAn r.bardoned her her*In No* York That under tne clr ciim.^t'inon he could cot change her domicile to such an extent as to rna ? her ampnthle to t-hc laws ol the state or Michigan'The dpfendsn Etncl Llrtman Browr sworn as a w tue» by the pi ail x If oa this trial emphatically denied any cruel \ or de ert on on her part ft id te tlf ed that tie de feudal t Julian Brow n Is he one wno was gu It of desertion T at testimony has not been contro-\er ed or deniedIf up. ?. sninrs that the Michigan d tcrcc was granted trie ly In ac co dance w it i the lews of tb.9 3 ate of M chlgan then the qtiea• • tm. 1=utacr.cd in. this p occen ng or hether such a t ck wou d he cun trarv to the lul fa ta anu credit ^ o a h Tjnl n 3 n Cnr*';Li tutiouThe m-r a-2 with Ethel List m n Brawn wts celebrated n the 5mo of he v id between two re d^nt# of th s St te end they •itert here nn 11 Mr B own de sertccl 1 t-r E^eu though he was a tonando resident o the State of Michigan hu leg h vdoped his j wen tcls c e he coula not tea.e \ 1th him In o that s ate so inucn of the mt LtnI rcla ODahlp a* ocrta ncd o the- stnvus and domicile o. h s fi i w fe shorn he had aban doned in this Sta cin m oo n On It I5 not a lola tlon of the full filth and credit clau e o p o ecL oup s ite ' cm e\ tending s jur die on to the «•* teal of aflec ng ;H*- tb no in ques t on ia ed n t e other *ta c (iiaddo v \s Haddock. '’Ql U S 5^6 o Dcm *.5 Dean Shi N -'MO 2*3) fi Mr B:o i s f * fci hrri been ed persona) wb c