An opinion among the decisions banded out by the supreme court last week is an excellent exposition of the thrift and fecundity of Bohemian ta-migrantSr but whether there is a moral attached to the example set forth we leave to the reader's judgment Anton Hartl and Josef a Harlcame to Cedar Bapids fresh from Bo-%hernia in 1887, with $40 and two chit dresi- Anton secured employment shoveling dirt at $1.50. per day, fa three years they had saved $300. They bought twenty acres of land near Cedar Rapids. When the pair were divorced in 1910 they had ten children and a farm consisting of 256 acres of land valued at more thani*1$100 an acre. Their property amount raed to more than $3o,0oot to say nothing of the stakes’* they had given their grown-up children. It was overa division of their property, followingthe divorce, that a suit found its way to the supreme court.y