Hide Article Text (OCR)
The testimony in rebuttal in theBereeford-Haw-kins (jase continues before Juilge Buchwaiter.A number of witnesses were examined, among them Frank J. Kelly, son-in-law of Mr. Beres-ford. lie denied that he had employed any repeaters, that he 'used money for illegal pnrpos.es, or that .he made propositions to ray one to tamper with the ballot boxes. This witness, and Mr, Campbell, of counsel fm- Hawkins, made several passes at each other of personal remarkswhich the court ordered to cease. The case willgo on this morning.The district court decided eases as followsyesterday:SL66 Brown vs. Citizens' National Bank; judgment ravened.S.Ttfi. Thorner vs. Herracnurt; judgment affirmed,3.701. Marks vs. Harris; judgment affirmed., with penalty.3,702; Commissioners Hamilton County vs. Waters; judgment reversed.3,703. Schwab vs. Boppold et si; judgment affirmed.3,707. IeCa*tro Donner vs. Sbiakle, Howell A Kreto; judgment affirmed.'The case of the Tauszky Yeast Company vs. The Pittsburgh. Cincinnati A St. 'Louis Eailmad Company, which has been on trial before Judge ’ Harmon for a n. tun her of days past, was fester- ’ day taken from the jury on the conclusion of: the plaintiff's testimony and judgment was ' entered ior the defendant aompaQf.Judge Maxwell heard and decided the divorce cases of Mary i’owell va Andrew C. Powell and 8ar»h A. i’nnlum vs. Louis Purdora. In the first case a decree was allowed on the ground of adultery, and in the other ior extreme cruelty, iJudge Conner heard the oases of Edward Leonard vs. Mary E. Leonard. Af'ter the testimany was all In and the ease submitted the judge announced 'that he was not' ready to render a decision, and took .the nuttier under advisement.Judge Johnston heard five divorce cases in room b. as follows: Matilda Rane vs. George Kane: Ernest Kiopfer vs. Lena Ktopter; Julia Smith vs. John Smith; Mary F. Hitchcock vs. Leonard Hitchcock; S*rah E. Fitzpatrick vs. John C. Fitzpatrick. lu the Rane case m divorce was allowed for willful absence, and In the Klopfer case, on the ground of adultery. The othse cases were taken under advisement.
Newspaper Details
The Cincinnati News Journal
Cincinnati, Ohio, US
Wed, May 09, 1883
Page 3
Full Page
Clipped by
Jennifer S.
NA, 17 Mar 2024
Other Publications Near Cincinnati, Ohio
Cincinnati Kentucky Times Star
Cincinnati Christian Age
Cincinnati Israelite
Cincinnati North Journal
Weekly Cincinnati Times
