*i»' « Im'Ii* «!V» had • •lt;lt;«* n Slv tv fin n»\ l• -r ftvi v\-eWe nn one nn-nslnn, nnd in l!' lt;ilt; lt;1 her home dullerA lt;rn* nisi w-'e planted, returnable • ri June ill.CLAYTON V. CLAYTONKdnn Klli*r. Clarion of Ijiunre-ton snnirhr n •tlfumliitnn of her marrince with Hector Charlea Clayton, n railway employer ot l^unrv-'on. on tlir ground uf mji'ltv Mr !•* Denham fireen appealed tor priItloner.r-lllli.i'-i »nld she w.m married on t«nuniv !;t. !S3”. and respond* nt. abort K afterwards. hepnn to treat her bn illy, There had been nn srttument. Ih February PTi as to who** turn It was to so 1 *1* cemetery to visit then «nn'* ur n v Respondent Hirin g petitioner on thnt occasion. nml hardly * week passed without he etnn k pell-tinner unit she tmd to seek nedllt; n| md.Krli* Francis Boyle-, brother of prti-IJniier, *l«r save evidence A dm re* n!*l v\ sianted.HOPWOOD V. MOPWOODM'lnr Atkins llopwood. carpenter, of I,nun eston, sought a divorlt; e from Alice I^mlse Hnpwood on the cround of desertion Mr T -Shields. K.C