END OF THE VERNAL TERM.Hatch V6. Hatch and Hnlght vs. Haipht, Divorces—Buys LecturodCorrespondence Trlbune ]Vernal. t'tnh March V—In tho Dlsirictcourt tin tu^lno i of the term v.a? closedup a- followsAurllhv 15. Hitch v*. Trrtmiluh Hutch.Tho c.ii*'* h.niru; been heretofore b’-ardmil lalicn under advl»cnunt, tin dlvorc*was granted, giving plaintiff tho custodyof minor children »nd tho property Judc-mont as prayed forG B. llulcht v»». Olive J Halsrht. Thlrcnuso was In ard on tho motion of do-frmbmt for Mipplementur dccrer Thecourt grunt'd the defendant the cuatodyof th«» minor child iwlduh hud not boonrncntlonM nt ull In thlt;- decree heretoforeentered), and ordered plaintiff ipay do-fr-lldnnt In pro'Malons and momyforthwith and -Ti2.ro within Mxty days, P-ndlnr th- further action of lh«- court. Lyrurgus Johnson wu* appointed gunrdl-an of thlt;* pr-r.«on ami lt;'tut' of Lk yd. the minor child, and wn - requested «»» • JI rln- proj^erty t«nd apply tho mpnlt; to tho prop *r support of mother *ind r hlld Tho faoiP pn-M nu*d »how**d that tin* dr-fendant and child have not .sufficient food or clothing for tholr * omfort. and ar*-llvLnet in Jin abandoned .•daug’fitcr-hou.^ Tho defendant Im not a very well-to-do man. hut N»vy. ho v. Ill try and I hut th»*y do n* t Miffr L. Johnson \ Sons v* A«jvr»4«h r