DIVORCE CASE REOPENEDHaight vs. Haight, at Vernal—The Davis Hold-up Trial On.Corrlt; #pondeneo Tribune ]Vernal, Fob. 27 —In ‘I B Haight vs. Olivt J Haight, it was found that Judge Harts divorce decree of la^t year gav« plain!in the care and cus-] tody of the child, and talced the co^ts against th*.* wife, which Is clalnnd to ho tinprvcedcnLed, Judge Rhodes moves to s'-t aside the Judgment as to costs, as to the custody of the child, and asks for tho wlfo alimony, hlt;* s»ts forth that when the decree was grant ?d i thv- wife was without means ot i-m-1 ploying counsel and It appears that she was at one time an Inmate of the insane asylum at Provo. Hearing s i for March ln.