o6lt;:007 . f 0 0. r o o . # .)MENH Kr* 2CHICAGO JlDGIv HOLDS IX-('LK.%NLIXESS IS AHIXDAXT GHOCXD FOK LEGAL SKP-]0 j AMATIOX.tt andChicago. —The exact relation o'H E domestic bliss to an occasional bad8 18 lt;tMc-Oh, gay opcp a fortnight final!}has been fixed with legal exactitudeMany divorces have been granted „ because a husoann avoided the watei1 1 I ^0 2 v»8on. But here, at last, is onlt;] granted solely and exclusively be-imbcs; cause the husband stayed away fromthe water-filled tub.Generally speaking, George Girou j.| e wasn't a ba 3 husband at all. accord-10 1 ing to Mrs. ‘vVanda Giroux, who ap-- o peared before .ludgo Tuthill yestet ,s an(j day seeking a divorce. lie was agood provider He was a good coni-H g pan ion.g I But he Just simply wouldn't take2 i a bath!wski: Aversion To Water.husband, said he, must bathe if he Mrs. Giroux said it was immediately after their marriage, Aug. 26, H E 1908, that she discovered her hu -12 i hand’s aversion to water when ap-9 i plied in conjunction with soap. She Ferry 8a*d he w©uld look at the tub and Bres- turn awa'. *purnlng ablutions.“It was very unpleasant indeed, H E remarked the complaining wife, “in4 i the summer it was perfectly dreadful.4 9 Almost on my knees I begged him torgen; He said he was too tired—healways evaded some way. ! tried to yj e have a certain dav on which he was 3 9 to bathe, but it was no use. I eveng 1 got the water hot for him, but to noi and Purpose. He refused to keep clean.”Judge Tuthill finally interrupted H E the testimony of Mrsi Giroux to say6 A that her complaint was sufficient 4 4 grounds for granting a divorce. A an(j husband, said he, mjist bather if hr Wil- e*pects %o retain his wife.