itatistics *NEW SUITS FI'— 4vovmr or common , AIOO rwd e Rampiatna w_______II of Em p l oygagpi .Compan mi t io*' at aL At-L,* I peal from dsctftioit of Board of Raviaw r*\ Karri*, for divorca*n AOOOOS—Emma S. Kla using vs. Ray IJ. mond Af Klauafng, “»r| .AfOOlO—Rosemary Hays# ys, Cuftfit5.000Malar. For 910.000 as damafts.it O^IrH*f*!n BL flMyoi vs.' Kmtni 114 Malar, tor 910.000 as damage ' ,A 99011—A u bray Buaao vs. Nicholas Russo. For divorca, custody of children and alimony,AWOU^LorMta Smith vs, Wosloy Smith; For divorce; AO^OH william H. Fuhrman vs. .Moo* balls Fuhrman. For divorca.A10015—Stanley D.' Davtg vs. Boh J Davis, for divorca. - * : * .•;A90010-—Alma E. Yates. vs. Jamas Yates, for divorce, ~:% J*AS0017—Edwin C Butters vs, lEdna Butters. for divorca. V-.'-^VV.* ^*1,A10019—K. L. Bach Iar xt, EUla D at aL. for 9900.-Millard A. Musa vs. Dorisfor divorce. mSlavaBalint. fof divorca.5.1 A99001—Aaron D. Black wall vs. Jean-: netteL. Raese at aL, for partition ofL .SAOoenTTwiOW Trua vs. Barnard 4.True. for divorco.' -.^••^Wuiic Hall L. 9 B. Co. vs.