T Ire dot Mavr 16il JLIfe.Ella vs, Wilson Barber Jh thelillu o-' orj^ of the new divorce casts. Fn.Ir.UfC states that they wore mar-r-i'efi in cedar Rapids, in April. JS35. arid that they lived together until January 10. 1S9D: that defendant iiaa not supported her for ten yeans and tnat in other respects he has not been what a dutiful siiushana shouldliti' #En:tr»a Ankney states that she married James A. Ankney In Cass to\vn ship. Jones county, jn September. 1S(191 that-for the past ten years-sheIn is resided in Central City, --he states that defendant has become anhabitual drunkard, and Llmt m November; 1895b she brciifUvt fuiL mr divnri’LU but defendant promised to reform and be $oo(J and it Ur. agreed to [s.rivcy U her a share n: his proper-tv. She thereupon dismissed thesuu,.hiit defendant forgot his prr-miae alum one month. , She ehai’pres that t ocollected the proceeds of a 5-100 nmo which he ouphi. Lo have turned, river Her nr.cl in other ways violated ms promise. She now asks • Lor- an absolute dt’crbu of divorce, wiLh alimony nf $1,660' and an attachment on cor-ifiin property lor Ihe Sj^JQQr»collcct.cd onthe note.* ■ • . .rIda Yovmpr asks a decree. Irom J. E Young: and sUlLcs that they were married in Benton county In 1S91. butdefendant deserted her In JS97. bhcj h 1-.n V»rmn OTllillV' t 1 L