nano uivuibctSecond TimeMRS. JEAN CRAIG SUES MARSHALL CRAIG AND ASKS$500 ALIMONYALLEGES CRUEL TREATMENT( .SKS CUSTODY OF DAUGHTERAND ALLOWANCE FOR HER 8UPPORT.Suit i'cr divorce was tiled in the Clark Cineuit Court Monday by Mrs Jean Craig against Marshall Edward Crajg, alleging cruel treatment and failure to provide. This is the second action of the k nd filed by the plaintiff who on the first occasion nemarried she alleges after promises of kind treatment and support.The couple were married Septem-*ber 25. 3913. and separated March 21. 1914. In the complaint it is re-cited that the plaintiff and defendant were married once before ane divorced in 1907, but later the defendant, by promises of kind treatment and support, persuaded the plaintiff to again become his wife, and after living apart six years again married.. The plaintiff charges that on account of cruel treatment ami failure of the defendant to prov do1 fcr her she again was compelled toleave him. In •addition to a divorce Mis. Craig seeks judgment for alimony in the sum of $500. custody ot a daughter, Eva Tarbell Craig, and ant allowance for her support. It is alleged the defendant eirns from $50#to $75 a month. He is a blacksmith and resides at Watson.Mrs. Craig resides at 317 East Maple street, and her occupatYm is given as that cf a clerk