Hide Article Text (OCR)
the well . Is now' on a signatures m tu present n establish-ol I or deaf •astern pui l nee ting withhe will ouisor French purpose cx-lowa:, citizens of that there and dumb ling in the ty of whom r the state, Mor to hour treinc west-ol. Con sc-u at home he time han sccsaity for Us hundred unell iJluffs rovWed lor. cts, we the fully petl-i school in mu.French was i he Mcasen-Mrfr. Hnttle Ilelngartner did not remain long- a divorced woman. 8he »s nw Air’s. dteijp*. Louis Hteese called jit the office of the clerk of the courts last rfal* urduy and said he desired to get a mar* rlfge license. lie was waited on by Deputy Clerk Stemro. who asked hint w hat thlt; name of his Intended bride was. Ho prodiic* d a slip of paper on w hich his own and lhe name of Miss Hattie McMahon whs written. He was then required tlt; make affidavit that there went no legal impediments to his getting married. and a license wus then issued to him. The to-be bride was not present, ami air. Bt4lt;we gave, her ago as 41 ycais and his pwr* *2. After he had taken his departur . Mr. Strmni wa.-i asked if he knew who Hattie McMahon was and he replied irt the negative, tvhefl he was told that ihe wus Mrs. HalUe Hefngaci-iu-r. who crested such a furore while giving testimony in the divorce proceeding!!, in which she was the defendant and which had the effect of making Judge O’Donnell feel as though life were not worth the living.The marriage was performed by the Lev. i.. J. iireniier. putftor of the German Methodist church, at Seventeenth and Iotfa Streets, and was witnessed by Mrs. I.ydla Brenner and Mrs. Elizabeth Bernhardt. When Stotse, who was th*- 1 slurCoolmlt;A of all plete the stThis is a^Hortnii city. /boarddr** whose name figured In th«» slguafurt a secured 4W tie nort bl this vtcl tier noun ties iBVU visited •rro Gordo, •bago. Kos-inson. Ciay, Woodbury, iilhotin. and ?avoT to se-t Influentiali ui--rk * getkitedeputy to lime any. time In making outvorceoffice,backproceedings, called at th* ho said he was In u hurry to to Chicago, and did not wantStylishMonarclmerit.e most curt- I g ». lt;ns it will lo sign as-ods of thetltlon since to Webster Falls. El-placti*. Un-lMIt .\Ugllatvtll hold i it » lo *, resolutions •ct, the •;*-the ctipid plaster. Now the peculiar thing about this marriage Is that Mrs. Hein* galiner assumed her maiden name when she had no legal right, so it is said, to it.in the decree of divorce granted by Judge O Donnell, nothing Is said ns to her g. »-ting back her maiden name; and in ihc cross |Ht»tl«*n for a divorce which she tiled she did not ask to be given back her maiden name, so th.it she had no right to use it when she married the slur boarder. She was silli Mrs. Hattie llein-gartn**r and hot Miss Hattto McMahonwhen she fflgntd her name to the return made by the minister who married her. It is understood that the luw provides that the witnesses to a marriage must know the person** who arc married; oth-efwise they are incompetent lo act iu| The question now is Do tlic witness** to Dm marriage know tli.itPrices •'lt;$2.00 ai: New 1 O' the newWe arehis Ktra1I smooth . thing ylt;at 50c,#» persons they rcpre-isirs' th•Ives to Im*? A lawyer under the decree and her own * to esk for It. Mrs. Helngariner t.sfihlt;d in law In assuming her miHtI I wouldda. but tit*sal of thla rrtut wh* iv istern a.ida teacher ‘splits, and r such men nd Itnstorg the litct lie Hague-hose won-wonder to iaguewood ise of rulB-Hlle has ic Is even r» accuracythe sentthat ■Ion noten name. He said he did not know th.it anyone would trouble himself about tho matter, although some complications might arise in the future that would affect the legality of the marring*. Bteeas, In his affidavit, swore that the mime of the woman he Intended to marry was Hattie Ml Million, but. under the law. she is Hattie M ringsrtntr. The probabilityIs that nobody will care whether her name is any one of the three mentioned or not. Her sudden marriage caused a surprise at the court house, for nearly all the officials knew more or less of thu divorce case proceedings; and the tale of woe’ she unrolled was such as to make all W ho heard It believe that she would not siKn again run her head into th« matrimonial noose Her new hus-bard. as stated during the trial, worjtrdHot we Mereeri; drawers ‘£ial. All «• i and ....,—xsr®at Richardson s tire, and is now■Hb* factory before th« a resident of Chicago.ie thoughte In Mau-W’htHll UtMOVING THE SAND LIVELYHIS
Newspaper Details
Daily Times
Dubuque, Iowa, US
Tue, Jul 09, 1901
Page 5
Full Page
Clipped by
Carol L.
NY, USA 05 Aug 2017
Other Publications Near Dubuque, Iowa
Sunday Morning Telegraph
Dubuque Daily Telegraph
Dubuque Daily Herald
Dubuque Democratic Herald
Dubuque Witness
