Superior Court.►yyrtv-j vt ■ ■•■*•*# rv rri *m0 Sau Theu Were'. ■»twounusual petitions have been filed «at the clerk of ednrte bifiee the*peat week. They awgefitlbfilfortaunuta^^ differ fr^'p divorce libels in that they olaim the originalmarlftage•. was not in /rognlarph^lemoniffij:raoer^oodi^-T4i^tookplaoe at fipoaick falls, ^;i^pI-i90Sand that Misr^E^^' Wffi^rand that he was forced tomarry^her by the threat of;prpBeciK tion If he did not. * The other ia that of Barn-side R. Da\ Is of Frying vs. Jen ole Wright of« Wendell. They hwere ; married by N- O. Plumb, a justice of the. peace, at Parley,.he was 19years df age and.that he was forced To marry the ^lrl by threat of prosecution anc was not allowed to consult counsel Atf to what action ,to take. • 'A divorce liber has been * filed at the clerk df^cdarts c®ceMillers Palis vs. /rank 8r. Washburn of San^Francisco, Ca 1., c harking desertion. Theywere married at Millers Falls, Jab* 9,1888,and lived in MlPers Falls, North Ahms and Fitchburg.. . .* The Connecticut Valley Street JRail way'Co., has filed a bill of complaint vs. the Mil-lers Falls Co.. This is virtually. a continuation of the; case of toe Greenfield andallegeMlllerslPIBtreef Rallway Co.,ehHfieid. ahd Turners “Pal 1 s SttreeOp., a new bill of com-plaint48ePteredrT \•TWv