rTWO JORY CASESDisposed of In Circuit CourtI2, Yesterday.re*8 Waldron vb. Walker Matter Settled by isCompromise, and No Cause of Ac-,0 f istion in Case of Roberts vs. 8chofleld f —Several Divorce Cases Put Overand Two Decrees Granted.r-eratc*-sI1I'8IThe two remaining jury cases on i trial in the Circuit court were disposed of yesterday. The trial of the case of Jennie E. Waldron vs. Mary M Walk- j er was discontinued yesterday morning pending a proposition for a mutual settlement, which was effected in the i } afternoon by a compromise, the de-,s fendant giving a note for an amount y agreed upon with the plaintiff 1In the case of Robert C Roberts vs. Victor N. and T. N Schofield, a verdict of no cause of action was rendered by \ the jury in a few minutes after retiring. The case involved a promissory j note for 8100 with accrued interest amounting to 833.60. The note was given by the Schofields for certain 1 | stock in the creamery at Williamsburg, 1 e J which the defendant claims was never I °J delivered to them. The defense was j that while the note was given in good y faith they did not receive the stock d which they were entitled to and for e ; which the note was given.A decree was granted in the divorce cabe of Emma S. Arlt vs. Ernest Arlt,° i also in the case of Hulda M. Martin vs.r-George Martin, Mrs.Martin being given r~ the custody of their child, a lad five j years of ace.Divorce cases in which the court re-»t served decisions are: Martha A.a Cross vs. Benjamin Cross: Cora B. Rich-ardson vs. Frank W. Richardson.Several cases will go over the terra, as follows: Ettie Brewster vs. Charles W. Brewster: Emma B Williams vs. Fred W. Williams; William Cox vs Anna Cox.In the matter of the petition ofVs1:o