Hide Article Text (OCR)
i**./ i inn r»ncj nru iivumirm caenoBD. lt;14,71*3—Catherine Fisher vs Thomas Fisher. 64,796—Franz lictceakeiujer va. Lcroadine Het-tesheimor.64.807-Margaret A. Dougherty vs, Thomas G, Dougherty.04.813—I,aura E. Stewart vs. Samuel Stewart.Lizzie Wecirter vs. John A. Week ter. Johu H. Bart vs. Medurn Bart.Rcsa Drockiugbrod vs. George Drockcn-64*84264.8 5201.807brod.64.88004.00864.01104,01364.91764.02464.004iMary Carney vs. John Csrnev.,897—Cora Herrington \s. Jdhn F.ton.Theobald Kclseh vs. Henrietta Kelsch.Mary Pro«a vs. Wtu, Prlt;«?. l.llaC. Watruer vs. Herman A. Wagner. Charlotte flicks vs. John N, Hick*. Stephanm Lunuer vs. Chas Landor.. Martha i\ Onktcy vs. Joseph B. Oakley. Mary Sinclair vs. Win. B, Khiclair.Anna M. Dulle vs. John H. Dalle. Gustav Schleuter vh. Anna Sctileuter. 64,955—Willis G. (lark© vs. Ross Clarke. 64,961—Amelia Thomas vs Prosly Kail Thomas. 64,968—Frau dec a Hermann vs. J.ocob Hermann. 61,886—Job© E Steven* iss. Mnrgaretta Slovens. 64 990—Elizabeth Harding vs. Albert Harding. 64,008—Frank M. Fratz vs. Ernelie Frau.61.930 64,01064.95065,010—Louisa Meuce vs. Charles Menge. 65.036—Fram es Hofer vs. Charles 1T4,flt;65.042—Samuel T. Moier vs. Esther J Moler. 65,045—Jiur.c* J lt;atn vs. Mar. Jane Cato. 65,048—Ada Milltken vs. Robert M fill ken. 65,055—Charles Ley* vs Maitlm Ann Keys. 65,070— llt;la May Breed vs. Albert J. Breed. 65,097—Christoph Dreiser vs. Henrietta Droser, 65,110—Late llmker vs. Wiiitara A. Krakcr,65,128—Alonzo W. Williams vs. Annie Williams.-Mary E. Strouden vs. Sylvester fctrou-65,14 4 dev.65,140ScLroer.65,100Gerhard H. Bchroer vs. MargaretKrevy--W m. Bnrkhardt vs. Regina Burkhardt.655.215—Ixtnisa Cox vs. Walter fe. Cox.65,216—Kate L. Krewsoa vs. Samuel son.65,222—Amelia Baum man vs. George Banmman.(^5,236—Margaret A. Redman vs. Charles 11. Redman.65,237—Samuel Cooke vs. Carrie Cooke.65.252—Mary n. Tiberglein vs. Samuel H. Tiber-glcan. ;65.253—Ida E M. Pott vs. Eugene Post. 8 65,266—Mary Sullivan vs. James Sullivan. 65,202—Leak M. Carr vs. Thomas 8. Carr. 65,264—Rissa Campbell vs. William M. Campbell. i • * -T65,276—Emma Slow re. Beniamin F. Slow. 65,284—Wiihelujina Fleler vs. Henry Fleler. 65.300—Maggie Vaughn vs. Etauk Vaughn.65.304—Mary £. Doubleday vs. Alfred Doubleday.65.323—Frederick Haasaurek vs. Eltza Has-saurefc.65.324—Emma Bllck vs. William Bllck.65,320- Ellen J Fowler vs, Smith N. Fowler. 65,336—John W. Foster vs. Aila F. Foster. ✓65,347— Mollie M. Steele vs. Lev. S. Steele. 65,356—Clara Talbott vs.,Charles A. Talbott. 65.358—Philip H. Engle vs. Mary Engle.-Louis Zwiffelholier va. Josephine Zwlf-Am rico. The programmes are excellent in eveiy sense and to tko highest degree,and the managers have engaged tbo very tiist talent to be found in ail the world. We will have, first and foremost. Adelina ’Patti, the Italian-Spanish American, whose marvelous voice was just hinted to us atihe“Allt;5^«iaij'”rcrforniniice List month. Thcnarwy universal and discouraging miumur of distq point-uicnt trembled in the air, but that Instead of beinga condition of things which would bode evil to theapproaching Opera Festival, rather whets de-tiro to hear the bird of paradise in her real style of music. She eeug marvelously of course, but there is no denying that her native element is the florid aud impassioned opera of France ana Italy. In tht* music, which Is the very essence aud soul of color aud sensation made audible, she has no rival. As Violetta, or as Leonora, or as Rosina, there is no one who can be mentioned beside her for oDe Instant.The other singers, also, sre great In their various specialises. None grander than CatapouJni aud Cullassi could be desired by the most fastidious taste.THE BANNER CONCERT.This evening, at Melodeon Hall, rhe little prodigy. Mkhel Banner, will appear iu a graud cou-oert. This child, for he 1* really nothing more, can even now play like a man. He has bud from his earliest years a talent for ihe violin which la simply and absolutely phenomenal. Under his tlngers the strings throb and vibrate like living souls, and hi* bow has a power, a delicacy, a rapidity, n firm artist grasp which many a concert player of advanced year* and wide reputation m'ght well covet. Ho ha* made rciharkable progress since he was enrolled hero as one of Professor jHcobsolsn’B pupils, and at the present time lie Is one of the very rew artistic violinists of the first rank which this country can boast. This will be the only opportunity to hear him for perhap* another year.Reserved seats can be obtained to-day at the musie store of John Church Co.hlt;c€T!Pi: hlt;atStHlaqitoi re at tliT1ofweib]IoltofoEnjlt;B,s r■ PiB65.367-felbofter.65,373-65,387-65,390-P.-Louis A. Cones vs. Thomas R. Cones. -AnaTOw J. Ray vs. Mn:th» .T. Rav. -Jacob Wagner v*. Theresa Wagner. 65.416—Charlotte E. Worth v*. WilliamWorth.65,451—Theresa Elkins r*. Jnmes H. E'kma.65,45©—Kaus Riley v*. Charles F. Rilov.65,457—l^ouiea M. Dnvle vs. Jos. M Davis£2•!:*§“y.ary WermOnr vs Henry Armour. 66.465—W m. A, Demo vs. Edna Demo.65.467—Rosa Snutli vs. Harry J. Smith.65,477—Lizzie Gosling vs, John C. Goaiing.65,460—Sarah Goldsmith vs. Nathan Goldsmith.. v!7 -i65.482—John U. McIntyre vs. Louise K. McIntyre %65,485—Mary Knapp vs. George Knapp.65,489—Lewi* Kettering v*. Louisa Belle Kettering.65,515—Chas. E. Toetor vs. Mary C. Teeter. 65,518—Catherine O’Neil vs. Hugh J. O’Neil.65.529—Barbara Hememan vs. John G. Hoine-na*.65.530—Margaret Phlllmore vs. Wm. C. Fhlll-more.6*5.531—Belle Jones vs. Fountain Jones.65,561—Mary A. Adams vs. Albert II. Adams.Distillers’ Meeting.The Executive Committee of the Western ExportAssociation held Its monthly meeting at the Burnet House yeeteiduy. Ihcre were present Messrs. J. Abel, of Chicago: Philip Zell and J.B. Greenliut. of Peoria; John Boggs, of Saelbyville; AlbertBoris, of St. Louis, and Thomas Gaff and Edward Slovens, of Cincinnati. Matters or Interest only4*to the distilling business were discussed, anddetails of the working of the Association arranged. ■ 7 ;AfoinDVgfflFtsntThe Uaraess«Mnkers’ Strihe.The harncss-makers who struck on Tuesday at DeCamp, I^ovoy A Co.’s factory, on Mciu street, dcblio it said that the iDtroductton of cutting machinery was not the cuuse of their leaving theshop. A “scab” hud been given employment, and it was against thot act that they protested, and on nocouut of It that they struck. They tny they will not go book until the “scab” Is discharged. The proprietors say they prefer to stick by the“scab.” b-K p!zltoPifllAPNITiiThe Telephone Talk.Although It is true that President W. n. Forbes. Geooral Manager Vail aud Assistant Manager Phillips, of the American Bell Telephone Coin-puny, are ;tt confereuoe here with the Directors of tbs local company, it is untrue that It is an effort at a consolidation. The meeting has reforencs to the interpretation of nn existing contract, and notofl8u1
Newspaper Details
Cincinnati Commercial
Cincinnati, Ohio, US
Thu, Jan 12, 1882
Page 8
Full Page
Clipped by
Cincinnati A.
OH, USA 23 Jan 2021
Other Publications Near Cincinnati, Ohio
Cincinnati Kentucky Times Star
Cincinnati Christian Age
Cincinnati Israelite
Cincinnati North Journal
Weekly Cincinnati Times
