Hide Article Text (OCR)
MARITAL MISERY.DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HUSBAND3 ANDWIVES, AND WIVES AND HUSBANDS.LIST OF DIVORCES FILED DURING THETEAR 1881.Below we Fire • foil list of tbe divorce anltsfiled during tbe jeer la tbe Court of CommonPlea#. Some of them have already been published.The llet given la a complete one for tbe full year:63,694—Kate Heuimlt ve. John Heinmlt. 63,709—Richmond Slaughter ve. AdelineSlaughter.63.714—John R. Gorlsy vs Elizabeth Gorlej.63.717— Ellen V, Bchater ve. Henry Schafer, jr. 63,754—C. Jaoobine Hirt ve. Chrieiopher Hirt. 63,756—Elizabeth Sickmon ve. Dietrich Sick-man.63.790—Margaret J. Coen ve. George H. Coen.63.792—C lara Long ve. Peter Long.63.793—Minnie Genelo t%. Anthony Gonein.63.794—Annie E. Wozencraft ve. Edwin D. Wo-xeot raft.63.796—Erneetlne Abt v#. Fran* Joseph Abt. 63,813—Emma Scbuhol* va. Andrew Sehaholz. 63.820— Josephine Holland va. Andrew F. Hoiland. - /63,824—Sophia Kruse ve. Chrietlan Knise. 63,834—Eniina Grotatn ve. Wn. Kirby Gteaaln. 63,837—Lydia Vantaut ve. George Y'srtzact. 63.844—Louisa Ruckrtexel va. Andrew Ruok-rlegel.•3.852—Mary Carter re. Baoinel Carter.63,872—Emma Huuefer ve. Louis W. Hunster.63,880—Wm. Bemlcko ve. Josephine U. Bc-mlcke. .•63,882—Joeepb Michael ve. Dora (or Dolly) Michael.63,885—Marla E. Eckstein va. Martin Eckstein. 63.888— Wni. H. Hl«iks vs. Sarah E. Hicks. 63,890—Dena Uantraeyer va. August Dammeyer. 63.895—Sebastian Sobalk va. Florentine schalk.63,902—Johanna Schwartz va. Fells Schwartz. 63,912—-Jennie B Air vs. Charles V. Air.63,923—Mattie McGill vs. Win. McGill.63,933—Michael J. Diilon ve. Mary Dillon. 63,941—Mary Walohcr vs. Michael Wuloher. 63,943—Cornelia Regcerman vs. August P.egter-roan. - .63.948—Jamea laaae McClain ve. Kezian Mc-Claia.63,950— Ralph E. Gufllin va. Angelina M. Gus-tin.63,959—Mary Rhodes vs, John Rhodes. p63.96-1—James Lawrence ve. Lizzie Lawrence. 63,968—Mary Ueurrnmn vs. Heorv Hettertuan 63,970—Coraolla Smith vs. Clarence E. Smith.63.97-4—Isaac Smith vs. Mnrv Smith.63.ArmstrongG.Armstrong.63,997—Adeline Henry va. John Henry.64.011—llenr*- W’eesel va. Gather! oe Weasel. 64,021—Abrahaiu Joitt-s vs Paulina Jones. 64,025— Mary Spetden vs. Thomas C. Speiticn. 61,0x7—Ella Smith vs. George Smith.64.034—David Hunter vs. Jennie Hunter.64,038—Louisa Oracle vs. Joseph Dreule.64.053—Eliza Ann Stone vs. Guilford Stone.64.054— Margaret Sciuffbr ▼ a. Frank S. PeMflVr. 64,061—Kuianuel Plaukcnborn vs. Eieouore APlan I. lt;n born.the room in which he was playing. The lighting of a match at once set the gas aflame, and the child’s head and neck were most painfully burned. The mphtVserioua injuries were to the eyes, which have ever since been closed, and fears are entertained that he Las been totally blinded. Fortu* natcly the flame went oat almost as quiekly as It was lighted and did not reach the child’s clothing, otherwise the injuries might have been even more serious than they are.Tbl# miniature stove seem* to be vastly more dangerous than the toy pistol, but explosives con tinue to be popular as playthings for children.illt;ttGENERAL PRENTISS.iIsUnusual Attention Shown Him by tbe Chamberof Commerce. ]The subjoined preamble and resolutions were Introduced on 'Change yesterday:Whereas, General M. B. Prentiss, early andpromineutjy ident.ifi.ed with the operations of the | Western army during tbe rebellion is about to visit our city, us the guest of theex-Army and NavyOfficers, theiefore be itResolved, That the orivileges of the Chamber be extended to him, and ho be invited to be present with us at suchtime as may beat suit his convenience during his stay in the city, and a committee of three be appointed to advise him of such action. 5 President Urner will please call the Chamber to order for the consideration of the above resolution. R. R BPKINGEK,[ A. II. IIINKLE,f . Seth Evans,| A. J. My i.(.axe,{ J. N. Kinnkt,M^. Eggleston moved a refsrcncs of the resolution, but afterward withdrew his motion.Hi. Wilson Brown desired to know why an exception to the usual custom of tbe Chamber should be made in favor of General Prentiss. It was establishing a precedent that might becometroublesome.iI1iBniGGS MV1FT, W. II. 11 ARRISON,G, T. Roots, Richard hmith, Geo. W. Joke*.lt;8tI1tfGeneral Hlckenlooper urged the adoption of the resolution by the Chamber, which waa dono unanimously. *Mr. Brown afterward explained to a reporter that those who had seemed to oppose the resolution wore a# cordial as General Hiokenlooper in theft desire to have the privilege of the floor extended to General Prentiss. The point upon which they hesitated was the advisability of extending an invitatioft in the form of a resolution adopted by the Chamber. The invariable custom haa been for tbe President ofItfc6d1cfta\tbtheChambertoinvitedistinguished Ivisitors to go upon the floor. The President of the United Btatea, the Secretary of the Treasury, General Grant and other notables have becu given .the prlvllero of the Chamber in that way. If au invitation in the form of a resolution addptod by the entire Chamber is extended to General Pren-!tis* thfn it. most be tu other notable*, and die- 1tiuruiabed visitor* vritl not feel like accepting an Invitation from the President only, kno'rtog thatafa|uooht£0
Newspaper Details
Cincinnati Commercial
Cincinnati, Ohio, US
Thu, Jan 12, 1882
Page 8
Full Page
Clipped by
Cincinnati A.
OH, USA 23 Jan 2021
Other Publications Near Cincinnati, Ohio
Cincinnati Kentucky Times Star
Cincinnati Christian Age
Cincinnati Israelite
Cincinnati North Journal
Weekly Cincinnati Times
