({ ors to maiie partition. ^New Suits Filedre : h• vWiidU?'*itJanie? O. Harris vs Rachel A. Har* rG: divoroe. P. I’, and Id. I. James. i% attorneys for plaintiff, jf Margaret Nolan vs Grant Nolan: dirt i voree. I). C. Johnson attorney for n plaintiff.)i' Gale Mfjj. Co. vs Clarence N. Per-Kins; account and attachment. Con-e. ley A: Conley attorneys for plaintiff. I Indianapolis Hard ware Co. vs Clar-1 enee N. Perkins: note and attachment. ! ^ Conley a: Conley attorneys for the j ^3f plaintiff. 1 ^Krnest H. Huenefeld vs Clarence N. \ *■ Perkins: account. Conley X Conley j H h attorneys for plain tiff. ; ^Zion Clark vs Llenora Clark: divorce, ; of Khoads a: Aikman attorneys lor the uf 3f plaintiff.cci1J