Article clipped from Cincinnati Commercial

y.'io—i iiiis, ii. KiwDwnu vs. jonu i iaiKe.ROOM NO. 5 -JUDGE BURNET—DIVORCE CASES.30.‘223—Amelia T.ancaster vs. Isaac Lancaster. 43,769—Eliza B. Andrews vs. Jolin 3. Andrews. 44.089—Alice A. Barnard vs. Albert O. Buruard.4 4.213—Charles Knrtz vs. Elizabeth Kurtz.1-1,244—Kliza Allen vs. William Allen.45.091—Francis A. Webber vs. Charles T. Webber. 45.606—Charles H. Foote vs. Sophia Foote.45,735—Henry Eggort vs. Agnes Eggert.43,983—l ewis w. Davis vs. Mary Davis.46.160—Regina Alleu vs. Burohanlt Allen.46,162—Augusta Mayer vs. Frank X. Mayer.46,166—Eva Kate William vs. Joseph H. Williams. 46,191—Narolasa M. Q. Richards vs. Chas. Richards. 46,283— Mahalia Baum vs. Henry Baum.46,324—Joseph,R. Holly \s. Eliza Holly.46,350— Carolina Keck vs. Conrad Keck.46,509—Hoes Cunningham vs. Eliza Cunningham. 46,534—Caspar HoelJiiug vs. Mary Hoeffling.46,561—Barbara Belier vs. Jacob Belter.46,569—Joseph Gasaer vs. Maggie Gasaer.SUPERIOR COURT.GENERAL TERM.1,707—nenry Nye vs. The Canal Elevator Company. 1,801—Jamus Bradford and 8. 8. Davis vs. J. B.
Newspaper Details

Cincinnati Commercial

Cincinnati, Ohio, US

Mon, Jan 03, 1876

Page 7

Full Page
Clipped by
Profile Icon
Monica W.

NA, 15 Jul 2021

Other Publications Near Cincinnati, Ohio

Cincinnati Kentucky Times Star

Cincinnati Christian Age

Cincinnati Israelite

Cincinnati North Journal

Weekly Cincinnati Times