4C11/ iiic UUUUiJU^i 4 VU A/w illlCAviewed. NcDUNHAM DIVORCE CASE. , “ ’Court Affirms Decision Rendered in Favor the i*of the Ex-C’ongressman. tion(Jincago, Feb. 13.—The appellate court howTuesday decided the celebrated divorce miracase of Dunham vs. Dunham, Ransom qW. Dunham, the ex-congressman, • and Elizabeth Dunham being the parties in Callf Issue. The appellate court affirms the decision , of Judge McConnell, of Sathe circuit court, in which the ex-con- her, lt;gressmara was granted a divorce; , it to malso sustains Judge McConnell’s rul- bubl ing that the -divorce decree ob-. do sc tained by. Mrs. Dunham in South the jlt;Dakota is of no force or effect in this capitState. The decision affirms the decree of Judge McConnell in every;point as fromto the property rights of the parties.The former Mrs. Dunham is now the wife of Allyn, the co-respondent in the Buit of the ex-congressman. . # tlie rfin